Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The evolution of soft balancing in informal institutions

The case of BRICS

Bibliographic Data

ID3708549
AuthorsMihaela Papa (0000-0003-1693-9920), Zhen Han (0000-0003-1104-0609)
Year2025
Volume101
Issue1
Pages73-95
Publication date2025-01-06
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ia/iiae278
OpenAlexW4406112419
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited3

The concept of soft balancing emerged in 2005 to analyse how states engage in non-military balancing against the United States. By 2025, soft balancing has become extensively discussed in the context of BRICS, which has evolved from a loose grouping of diverse powers into an active, complex and rapidly growing entity. However, scholars remain divided on the nature and drivers of soft balancing within BRICS. How has BRICS developed into a robust soft balancing coalition? This article uses insights from compensatory layering-a process where transformative change occurs through sequential bargains over institutional design-to demonstrate how BRICS builds soft balancing collaborations, selectively institutionalizes some cooperative activities, and expands its scope to include both soft balancing and non-soft balancing elements. It clarifies balancing and non-balancing behaviours within BRICS, providing new insights into soft balancing in contemporary power dynamics. The study shows how states centre their cooperation around a specific informal institution, enabling effective soft balancing outcomes

China · Context (archaeology) · Economic system · Economics · Geography · Institution · Load balancing (electrical power) · Political science · Scope (computer science) · Soft power · Computer Science · Global trade and economics · International Development and Aid · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law

  • The Arab/Iranian Region and the Multipolar Dilemma

    Open Access•Matteo Capasso, Walaa Alqaisiya•Sociology Lens•2026

  • China’s Normative Balancing

    Open Access•Bima Jon Nanda•Central European Journal of…•2025

  • Trump y las “astucias de la naturaleza”

    Open Access•Laurie Ramos, Leonardo Ramos et al.•OASIS•2026

  • The China Gambit

    Open Access•Arun Sukumar, Arindrajit Basu•Politics and Governance•2025

  • BRICS’ ‘proactive’ strategy in reshaping global order after the Russia–Ukraine war

    Kiet Hoang Le•Third World Quarterly•2026

  • Divergent status-seeking in elite clubs

    Open Access•Luís Gouveia, Luis Gouveia Junior•Revista Brasileira de Política…•2025

  • Informal governance and the Global South

    Uroš Prokić, Asbed Kotchikian•Third World Quarterly•2026

  • Navigating global status politics in the context of BRICS membership

    Emel Parlar Dal, Nobuhide Mert Matsumoto et al.•Cambridge Review of International…•2026

  • On non-Western norm shapers

    Open Access•Cristina G Stefan•European Journal of International…•2016

  • The Role of China and India in the G20 and BRICS

    Open Access•Andrew F Cooper, Asif Farooq•Journal of Current Chinese Affairs•2016

  • The internal and external institutionalization of the BRICS countries

    Open Access•Bas Hooijmaaijers•International Political Science…•2022

Citations per year8
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae