The G20 as an improvised crisis committee and/or a contested 'steering committee' for the world
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3712970 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrew F Cooper (0000-0003-2195-4367, Centre for International Governance Innovation, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 86 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 741-757 |
| Publication date | 2010-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00909.x |
| OpenAlex | W2026596665 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 65 |
Arguably the most important catalytic effect of the ‘Great Recession’ of 2008–2009 has been the creation of the G20 at the leaders’ level. As a form of improvised diplomacy the G20 merits extensive scrutiny, revealing as it does the degree of adaptation possible in the international system. The G20 links a significant ideational component, a new dynamic between established and emerging powers, and a complex set of issues. The innovative quality of the G20, however, rests on two very distinct strands of activity and tests of accomplishments. The G20 can be viewed as a ‘recession-buster’ with a vital but momentary purpose. Alternatively, the G20 can be taken to be an embedded ‘steering committee’ for the world. Both of these interpretations have validity. The crisis committee scenario highlights a technical regulatory-driven agenda. The steering committee scenario by way of contrast showcases the connection between the G20 and a new type of global settlement. Passing the test as a crisis committee hinges on very specific deliverables. Passing the test as a steering committee is even more demanding as any move toward a new state-specific ‘concert’ is highly contested. This article examines these debates, locating the G20 in a historical/comparative perspective and in terms of the wider context of shifting power structure at the beginning of the twenty-first century
Economics · Engineering management · Political economy · Political science · Steering committee · Engineering · Global Financial Crisis and Policies · International Development and Aid · Social Policy and Reform Studies
When populists meet
Networked G20 Governance of Covid-19 and its Transversal Crisis Effect
The G20 and the BRICS on Trade and Investment
The G20 Hub of Decentralizing Global Governance Authority
Between Hub Status and Parallelism
A Brief History of the G20 Institutional Dynamics (2008-2021)
Mission Creep? The Nontraditional Security Agenda of the G7/8 and the Nascent Role of the G-20
The Global Economic Crisis and the Future of Neoliberal Globalization
Considering Post-Crisis Stimulus Measures
Foreign Policy Strategies of Emerging Powers in a Multipolar World
Financial Crises
World Political Change
Rising Powers in World Politics
A Theory of World Politics
Rising Illusion and Illusion of Rising
Forum
Democracy Questions Informal Global Governance1
Chinese Leadership in the Evolution of “Hub” and “Parallel” Globally Oriented Institutions
L atin A merica in the G 20
Building Cooperation between the BRICS and Leading Industrialized States
How Do Emerging Powers Advocate Multilateralism? Examining India's Participation in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and G20
Trading privileges for support
Steering global energy governance
Governance and Democratization since the 2008 Financial Crisis
The G20 and ad hoc Embedded Liberalism
Steering towards reglobalization
Varieties of informal intergovernmental organisations
Global informalism and the G20
The spread of informal governance practices in G-summitry
How Brazil embraced informal organizations
A critical evaluation of rationalist IR in the analysis of informal institutions
The cascading dynamics of informal institutions
G20 Endorsement in Post Crisis Global Governance
The Prospects of the G20’s Support of Liberalism
Insider and Outsider Strategies of Influence
The New Political Economy of the Macroprudential Ideational Shift
Multilateral Organisations and the Limits to International Energy Cooperation
India’s recognition as a nuclear power
Market Creation by Leninist Means
The role of the chair in informal international organisations
Between Rewards and Risks
Innovation and deadlock in global financial governance
From shadow banking to digital financial inclusion
The European Union in the G20
G20 institutional transition and global tax governance
Contending regionalisms
The European Union in informal intergovernmental organizations
The Expansion of International Organizations
Multilateralism at War
The accidental agro-power
Shutting Down Protest
The Brandt Line after forty years
The prospects of deliberative global governance in the G20
Global politics are domestic politics
The changing practices of frontline diplomacy
China, India and the pattern of G20/BRICS engagement
G-group legitimacy in global governance
Repositioning in global governance
The Decay of Consent
The BRICS and Other Emerging Power Alliances and Multilateral Organizations in the A sia‐ P acific and the Global South
Assessing the variation of ‘leader-focused status’ in contemporary global governance
A Minilateral Solution for Global Climate Change? On Bargaining Efficiency, Club Benefits, and International Legitimacy
The G20's role in legitimating global capitalism
Between collective action and a fragmented political economy
Conferencing the international at the World Pacifist Meeting, 1949
| Unique citing works | 65 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4,33 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2026 (16) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 55 |