How do informal international organizations govern? The G20 and orchestration

Bibliographic Data

ID3715026
AuthorsChristian Downie (0000-0002-1559-1814, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume98
Issue3
Pages953-972
Publication date2022-05-09
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ia/iiac060
OpenAlexW4229364611
LanguageEN
Citations received8

One dimension of the growth in informal global governance has been the rapid rise in the number of informal international organizations (IOs). While some of these organizations, such as the Group of Twenty (G20), are now at the centre of global debates across multiple policy domains we know very little about how they govern. We do not have answers to critical questions, including to what extent do informal IOs rely on indirect forms of governance? On what basis do they select IOs as intermediaries? And why do IOs choose to participate as intermediaries? Drawing on an original database of G20 orchestration between 2008 and 2019, combined with interviews with IO officials and G20 negotiators, this article provides answers to these questions. The data highlight the frequency of G20 orchestration, the importance of capabilities and control in intermediary selection, and IO efforts to solicit G20 orchestration. The findings advance debates on informal IOs to consider how they govern, how intermediaries like the OECD can shape G20 agendas, and why IOs participate in these indirect governance arrangements

Business · Corporate governance · Dimension (graph theory) · Global governance · Intermediary · Orchestration · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Finance · International Development and Aid · Marketing

Tools

Open DOI