Left populism and foreign policy

Bernie Sanders and Podemos

Bibliographic Data

ID3734009
AuthorsEmmy Eklundh (0000-0001-5824-6503), Frank A Stengel (0000-0003-2384-7119), Thorsten Wojczewski (0000-0003-1370-4085)
Year2024
Volume100
Issue5
Pages1899-1918
Publication date2024-09-09
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ia/iiae137
OpenAlexW4402379665
LanguageEN
Citations received6

This article analyses how populism is conceptualized and studied in International Relations (IR) and argues that it should be seen as a political logic instead of a political ideology. It does so by demonstrating that 'populist foreign policy' looks radically different in analyses of the populist left, refuting the possibility of any distinctly 'populist' foreign policy positions. We argue that large parts of IR scholarship practise a form of concept-stretching that undermines the quality of analysis as well as the ability to make meaningful policy recommendations. Using the empirical case-studies of the politician Bernie Sanders in the United States and the political party Podemos in Spain, the article demonstrates that populism does not translate into any shared ideological positions, but is a way of formulating and performing-in these cases-leftist politics through which political actors can interpellate and mobilize different societal groups and demands behind their political projects. In particular, the analysis debunks common assumptions about populism's alleged effects on foreign policy and dangers to pluralist democracy, and shows that populism neither necessarily opposes multilateralism, migration and global public good provision nor formulates an authoritarian claim to power

Political science · Politics · Populism · Law · Populism, Right-Wing Movements

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access