The Stonehenge we deserve
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3735313 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Geoffrey Wainwright (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 74 |
| Issue | 284 |
| Pages | 334-342 |
| Publication date | 2000-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Antiquity (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-598X • E-ISSN: 1745-1744 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0003598x00059408 |
| OpenAlex | W2460744078 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 2 |
After years of discussion and argument, the fate of Stonehenge and its landscape has been decided. As Professor Geoffrey Wainwright (former Head of Archaeology at English Heritage) describes, there is at last political will to ensure a better future for the monument
Archaeology · Argument (complex analysis) · Environmental ethics · Political science · Politics · Wainwright · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · History · Law · Philosophy
Remake/Remodel
Landscape, Archaeology and Heritage
Social dramas and planning judgement
Bouncing on a huge inflatable Stonehenge
From ‘national disgrace’ to flagship monument
Responses to Geoffrey Wainwright's report ‘The Stonehenge we deserve’, Antiquity 74 (2000)
World Heritage Sites and the question of scale in governance and politics
The botanical identity and transport of incense during the Egyptian New Kingdom
Time please
New era for Stonehenge
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,38 |
| Citation span | 2000 - 2026 (27) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |