The rise of hybrid diplomacy
From Digital Adaptation to Digital Adoption
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3737261 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Corneliu Bjola (0000-0003-3609-4240), Ilan Manor (0000-0003-2039-3721) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 98 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 471-491 |
| Publication date | 2022-03-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ia/iiac005 |
| OpenAlex | W4220843762 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 29 |
The COVID-19 pandemic has forced diplomats to embrace virtual platforms and to learn to combine virtual and physical meetings in their work. In this article, we investigate how this process has taken place and with implications for the conduct of diplomacy. Specifically, we ask how diplomats have adapted to the transition to the virtual medium, what lessons have they learned from this, and how these lessons may inform the conduct of diplomacy in the post-pandemic period? We argue that diplomacy is about to enter a new phase, which we call hybrid diplomacy, in which physical and virtual engagements are expected to integrate, complement and empower each other. We begin by distinguishing between digital adaptation, a forced process brought about by external changes, and digital adoption, a strategic decision by diplomats to use specific technologies towards specific goals. Building on the results of a survey disseminated to 105 diplomats during the pandemic, we then examine how diplomats have adapted to the virtual medium and what challenges they see facing as they transition to the post-pandemic phase. While responders largely agree that virtual interactions are not a good substitute for physical diplomacy, we find strong support for the continued mix of virtual and physical meetings. They enable diplomats to maintain working procedures, collaborate with their peers from around the world, and continue negotiations that began offline. We conclude with a discussion of the technological and social factors that may inform the shape of hybrid diplomacy
Adaptation (eye) · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Diplomacy · Negotiation · Pandemic · Political science · Politics · Process (computing) · Public relations · Sociology · Work (physics) · Computer Science · Engineering · Law · Psychology · Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Global Governance Tools
Digital Diplomacy and Social Media Networks
Digital Disruption and Rethinking the ‘Script’ of Peace Mediation
Introduction
Diplomats as Skilful Bricoleurs of the Digital Age
Recasting the Role of Citizens in Diplomacy and Foreign Policy
The Digitalization of Diplomacy Maturity Model (Dd-Mm)
The Digital Hybridization of Ministries of Foreign Affairs
Digital Diplomatic Representation
Digital Diplomatic Cultures
The Digitalization of Permanent Missions to International Organizations
Transforming International Development
Virtual Diplomatic Summitry
From Micro to Macro Digital Disruptions
The aerial embassy
A new methodological quest to evaluate South Korean digital diplomacy in US government web domains
An Investigation of the Practice of Digital Diaspora Diplomacy
Follow to be followed
A “Tech First” Approach to Foreign Policy? The Three Meanings of Tech Diplomacy
The long road ahead
Outrageous” Diplomacy
Diplomacy under fire
Social media diplomacy for social visibility and social approval
Diplomatic Representation and Online/Offline Interactions
Blended Diplomacy
Coping with digitalization in diplomacy
Digital geographies of diplomacy
Evocative Screens
The Social Aesthetics of Digital Diplomacy
| Unique citing works | 29 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 7,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 22 |