The ILO at 100
Institutional Innovation in an Era of Populism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3751895 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Laurence R Helfer (University of Copenhagen, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 113 |
| Pages | 396-401 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | AJIL Unbound (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2398-7723 • E-ISSN: 2398-7723 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/aju.2019.72 |
| OpenAlex | W2994861476 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
International organizations rarely die, but they often become irrelevant. The mere fact of the International Labour Organization's (ILO's) survival thus says little about its accomplishments or impact. Yet the ILO has a rich history of reinventing itself in response to shifts in global labor conditions, and it has responded to those changes with legal and policy innovations that once attracted widespread attention and praise but have recently been met mostly with indifference
Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Populism · Praise · Sociology · International Labor and Employment Law · Labor Movements and Unions · Law · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |