Sovereignty in Cyberspace
Lex Lata Vel Non
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3752145 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael N Schmitt (United States Military Academy), Liis Vihul (ING Direct) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 111 |
| Pages | 213-218 |
| Publication date | 2017-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | AJIL Unbound (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2398-7723 • E-ISSN: 2398-7723 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/aju.2017.55 |
| OpenAlex | W2615731555 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
Globalization has not conquered sovereignty. Instead, the notion of sovereignty occupies center stage in discussions concerning the normative architecture of cyberspace. On the diplomatic level, the term is generally employed in its broadest sense, one that signifies freedom from external control and influence. For instance, when Western states raise the issue of human rights in cyberspace, those on the opposite side of the negotiating table fall back on sovereignty-based arguments. Mention of sovereignty in consensus documents is consequently often the price that liberal democracies pay to advance their policy priorities, such as individual freedoms and the availability of self-help measures in response to hostile cyber operations
Cyberspace · Globalization · Law and economics · Negotiation · Normative · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Sovereignty · The Internet · Computer Science · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · Law
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,29 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2022 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |