Presidential Signing Statements and Dialogic Constitutionalism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3752152 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Catherine Powell (0000-0002-1901-2250, Fordham University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 109 |
| Pages | 51-56 |
| Publication date | 2015-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | AJIL Unbound (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2398-7723 • E-ISSN: 2398-7723 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s239877230000115x |
| OpenAlex | W2623286470 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 6 |
When the Supreme Court held that the executive branch has exclusive authority to recognize foreign sovereigns in the Jerusalem passport case, Zivotofsky v. Kerry (Zivotofsky II), Jack Goldsmith hailed the decision as a "vindication" of presidential signing statements and executive power. Indeed, in the context of the debate over the treatment of the terror suspects, the New York Times had called such signing statements the "constitutionally ludicrous" work of an overreaching, "imperial presidency
Constitutionalism · Democracy · Dialogic · Epistemology · Executive power · Foreign policy · Political science · Politics · Presidency · Presidential system · Supreme court · American Constitutional Law and Politics · History · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,18 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2018 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |