Hope and Fear in the Midst of Coronavirus

What Accounts for Covid-19 Preparedness

Bibliographic Data

ID3756540
AuthorsDavid B Feldman (0000-0001-8351-4370, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, USA, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume65
Issue14
Pages1929-1950
Publication date2021-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/00027642211050900
OpenAlexW3207056971
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited48

Objective: The present study asks the question: What variables accounted for people's tendencies to take steps to prepare for COVID-19 during the earliest stage of the pandemic? Data collection took place from March 6 to 11, 2020. In particular, the study examines variables that have been shown to predict health behavior in previous research outside the context of the present pandemic, including hope, optimism, perceived risk, fear, and mental health variables. Method: Participants (222 adults in 39 U.S. states) were recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk. Online surveys included the Adult Hope Scale (AHS), Life Orientation Test (LOT-R), Health Anxiety Inventory (HAI), Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21), Impact of Events Scale (IES-R), and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Also included were items inquiring about COVID-19 perceived mortality risk, fear/anxiety, and preparedness. Results and Conclusion: Participants were asked to imagine that COVID-19 had different hypothetical levels of mortality risk, ranging from 1 to 10 percent mortality (at the time of data collection, the WHO estimated actual mortality of the disease at approximately 3 percent). For each level, participants rated the degree to which they would be willing to take steps to prepare and protect themselves from the disease on a 7-point scale. Nearly 49 percent of participants said they would be relatively unlikely (i.e., provided a rating below the midpoint of the scale) to take steps to protect themselves if the mortality rate were at the 3 percent level. Stepwise multiple regression including the aforementioned predictors showed that three variables accounted for unique variance in participants' levels of current preparedness: COVID-19 fear/anxiety, posttraumatic stress (as measured by the IES-R), and hope. Implications of these results are briefly discussed in the context of raising preparedness given that future public health crises are likely inevitable

Affect (linguistics) · Anxiety · Context (archaeology) · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Disease · Geography · Mental health · Optimism · Pandemic · Political science · Preparedness · Psychiatry · Scale (ratio) · Sociology · Clinical Psychology · COVID-19 and Mental Health · Demography · Medicine · Optimism, Hope, and Well-being · Psychology · Resilience and Mental Health · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access