Paradoxes of Polarization

Democracy's Inherent Division and the (Anti-) Populist Challenge

Bibliographic Data

ID3757627
AuthorsYannis Stavrakakis (0000-0002-5682-7547, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume62
Issue1
Pages43-58
Publication date2018-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0002764218756924
OpenAlexW2786883798
LanguageEN
Citations received64
References cited17

This article carries out a theoretical analysis of the relationship between democracy and polarization. It utilizes examples from a variety of premodern and modern societies to argue that difference and division are inherent to a vibrant democratic life and to representation itself. At the same time, a stable and pluralist democratic culture presupposes the establishment of a common ground required for reflexive democratic decision making. To take into account both requirements, this must be a special type of common ground: an agonistic common ground. Agonism, as opposed to both the politics of raw antagonism and the postpolitics of consensus, values the existence of real alternatives and even ideological distance but aims at sublimating their pernicious effects. However, an agonistic outcome is always the result of a delicate balancing act between oligarchic and populist tendencies. In modernity, it predominantly took the form of a paradoxical blend of the democratic and the liberal tradition. The current crisis of liberal democracy and its postdemocratic mutation obliges one to ask whether democratic crisis may cause polarization, rather than the other way around, and puts in doubt the ability of the "moderate center" to deal with it in ways consolidating democracy. The article illustrates its theoretical rationale with examples from populism/antipopulism polarization in contemporary Greece, where elite-driven antipopulist discourse has consistently employed dehumanizing repertoires enhancing pernicious polarization

Elite · Liberal democracy · Populism · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Religion and Society Interactions · Turkey's Politics and Society

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access