Cancel Culture Rhetoric and Moral Conflict in Contemporary Democratic Societies

Bibliographic Data

ID3758683
AuthorsJennifer Keohane (0000-0001-8681-5654, University of Baltimore, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume70
Issue7
Pages1022-1037
Publication date2024-03-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/00027642241240337
OpenAlexW4393281562
LanguageEN
References cited15

This article argues that cancel culture rhetoric has become a key language for moral conflict in a polarized polity. A thematic rhetorical analysis of two prominent figures who claimed to be canceled, Missouri Senator Josh Hawley and Harry Potter author J. K. Rowling, shows similar rhetorical moves despite different contexts. Drawing conclusions from their rhetorical strategies, this article contends that claiming to be canceled is an effective image repair maneuver in the contemporary, polarized political system. As Hawley and Rowling's rhetoric shows, claiming to be canceled allows a speaker to chart a middle course between empowerment and disempowerment while identifying a transcendent context to take a stand against a defined moral ill. Likewise, it crafts a moment of urgency wherein the speaker and their audience can relate, prompting a moralizing call to action. In short, claiming to be canceled facilitates storytelling where character work can occur in the service of image repair and image promotion

Democracy · Environmental ethics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Rhetoric · Social science · Sociology · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Social Media and Politics

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access