Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

It's Okay to Change Your Mind

You Do Not Need to Vote the Same Way Twice

Bibliographic Data

ID3758882
AuthorsKenneth J Levine (0000-0001-9924-6091, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume66
Issue3
Pages376-389
Publication date2022-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/00027642211009277
OpenAlexW3157396501
LanguageEN
References cited35

Voters make their decisions based on several factors; however, cognitive dissonance and ego-involvement are two forces that work to keep voters' choices consistent over time. Despite these internal pressures, there are times when a particular candidate has disappointed a voter to such an extent that the voter considers voting for a different candidate in the next election. 170 young voters were asked about their feelings of regret and their need for permission to change their minds and vote differently in a future election. Findings suggest that women and Democrats are more likely to need permission to change their votes than men and Republicans. Furthermore, there is a significant relationship between regret and desire to change one's vote with the need for permission to do so on election day. Lastly, the importance of having that permission will affect a voter's feelings of obligation to cast a ballot for the same party. Open ended responses explore the idea of obligation versus making a change in more detail. Findings suggest that correct messaging about the ability one has to change one's mind and also being granted permission to vote differently may be an effective campaign messaging strategy

Ballot · Cognitive dissonance · Feeling · Internet privacy · Obligation · Permission · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Regret · Voting · Voting behavior · Computer Science · Law · Media Influence and Health · Psychology · Psychology of Social Influence · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • The psychology of ego-involvements

    Muzafer Sherif, Hadley Cantril•1947

  • A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance

    Leon Festinger•A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance•1957

  • An introduction to cognitive dissonance theory and an overview of current perspectives on the theory.

    Eddie Harmon-Jones, Judson Mills•Cognitive Dissonance•2019

  • Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement

    Martin Fishbein•Readings in Attitude Theory and…•1967

  • Interaction Ritual

    Erving Goffman, Joel Best•Interaction Ritual•2017

  • Compliance-Gaining and Power in Persuasion

    Lawrence R Wheeless, Robert A Barraclough et al.•Annals of the International…•1983

  • Cognitive dissonance, ego-involvement, and motivated reasoning

    Christopher J Carpenter•Annals of the International…•2019

  • The Door-in-the-Face Influence Strategy

    Daniel J O’keefe, Scott L Hale•Annals of the International…•1998

  • Fear control and danger control

    Kim Witte•Communication Monographs•1994

  • Commitment and ego‐involvement in recreational tennis

    K L Siegenthaler, Timothy Lam et al.•Leisure Sciences•1992

  • Dimensions of Compliance-Gaining Behavior

    Gerald Marwell, David R Schmitt•Sociometry•1967

  • Ego‐Involvement and the Mass Media

    Open Access•Muzafer Sherif, S Stansfeld Sargent•Journal of Social Issues•1947

  • Behavioral Intention Formation

    Michael J Ryan•Journal of Consumer Research•1982

  • Nationalization and the Incumbency Advantage

    Open Access•Jamie L Carson, James Sievert et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2019

  • The Family and Voting Turnout

    William A Glaser•Public Opinion Quarterly•1959

  • The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections

    Robert S Erikson•Polity•1971

  • Congressional Elections

    David R Mayhew•Polity•1974

  • The case for motivated reasoning

    Ziva Kunda•Psychological Bulletin•1990

  • The Minimal Persuasive Effects of Campaign Contact in General Elections

    Open Access•Joshua L Kalla, David E Broockman•American Political Science Review•2018

  • Sequential-Request Persuasive Strategies

    Open Access•James Price Dillard, J E Hunter et al.•Human Communication Research•1984

  • Dimensions of Compliance-Gaining Situations

    Open Access•Michael J Cody, Mary Lou Woelfel et al.•Human Communication Research•1983

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae