My Back to the Future Moment for Terrorism

This article, with the benefit of hindsight, analyzes the accuracy (and inaccuracy) of my February 2001 article in the American Behavioral Scientist seeking to answer, "what is the future of terrorism?" I discovered that Shakespeare had it right, "The fault, dear Brutus, lies not in our stars, But in ourselves if we are underlings." There are two major factors that produce and sustain international terrorism-state sponsorship of individuals and groups that carry out terrorist acts and the actions of nation states that create an aggrieved class that is inspired to use violence to try to achieve political objectives or simply to avenge a perceived wrong. The conclusion reached in 2001 remains valid-Prevention and preparation can pay important dividends in deterring terrorism. But a government's response must be tempered with reason and prudence. Security and law enforcement policies must reflect the values and the vision that protect and uphold freedom

Adversary · Computer security · Criminology · Government (linguistics) · Hindsight bias · Law and economics · Law enforcement · Political science · Politics · Prudence · Sociology · State (computer science) · Terrorism · Computer Science · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

• The Future of Terrorism

  Open Access•L C Johnson•American Behavioral Scientist•2001

  Add to list