Ethical and Methodological Issues in Large Qualitative Participatory Studies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3759301 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Naomi Hossain (0000-0002-3244-2319, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK, corresponding author), Patta Scott-Villiers (0000-0001-8987-174X, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 584-603 |
| Publication date | 2019-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0002764218775782 |
| OpenAlex | W2803776315 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 31 |
Participatory research studies utilizing qualitative data drawn from large, diverse samples appear increasingly common in the social sciences, particularly in international development. This reflects demand for participatory approaches to researching human well-being at scale, comparative research on globalization and development, and breadth and scale in evidence-based policy making. "Big Qual" studies in international development increasingly combine qualitative with participatory methods and incorporate action research, oral histories, case studies, and visual methods. Apart from their scale (more sites and research participants than conventional "face-to-face" research) and diversity of contexts, these studies broadly share a focus on application, and an epistemological and ideological commitment to hearing and amplifying the voices of research participants and contributing to positive change in their lives. Some ethical challenges of Big Qual research-for example, reuse, storage, and sharing of third party data-have been thoroughly debated. Less is known of how complexities across time, space, and culture may shape researcher relations in large-scale participatory research, biasing results against context-specificity and meaningful local political analysis. Drawing on almost a decade's experience with large participatory research, this article explores why and how scale, encompassing a complex network of institutions, relationships, contexts, and cultures, affects the ethics of these studies. We propose that Bradbury and Reason's (2001) five criteria for judging the value and contribution of social inquiry are helpful: (a) the quality of relationships built, (b) the usefulness of the research, (c) its trustworthiness, (d) its relevance to vital issues of human society, and (e) its enduring consequence. Drawn from an action research tradition, these criteria constitute a comprehensive ethical framework particularly applicable to Big Qual participatory work in development studies. Through an empirical application of these criteria, the article highlights emerging ethical challenges facing applied social research in increasingly complex, multiscalar, and globalized contexts
Citizen journalism · Context (archaeology) · Engineering ethics · Participatory action research · Political science · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Data Analysis and Archiving · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Using Participatory and Creative Methods to Research Gender-Based Violence in the Global South and With Indigenous Communities
Bridging the gap between knowledge and justice
Ethical Issues in Social Science Research Employing Big Data
Individual interviews versus focus groups for evaluations of international development programs
Decision-making conditions for participatory student voice research at scale
The Political Economy of Food
Purchasing and Protesting
Infusing Education-Focused Qualitative Research into Disability-Inclusive Development
Embedding Big Qual and Team Science Into Qualitative Research
A mereological qualitative study protocol for understanding the lived experience of homelessness in California
Moral Prejudices
Myth of Community
A Theory of Justice
Coping and Resilience during the Food, Fuel, and Financial Crises
Living through Crises
Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms
Changing Paths
Can Anyone Hear Us
The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology
Qualitative secondary data analysis
Can We Re-Use Qualitative Data via Secondary Analysis? Notes on Some Terminological and Substantive Issues
Exploring the Politics of Chronic Poverty
What do buzzwords do for development policy? a critical look at ‘participation’, ‘empowerment’ and ‘poverty reduction’
Protecting Respondents and Enabling Data Sharing
Micro-Macro Links and Microfoundations in Sociology
A philosophical discussion of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research in social science
Evaluating participatory development
Whose Voices? Whose Choices? Reflections on Gender and Participatory Development
Reconceptions in Philosophy and Other Arts and Sciences
A Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data
Whose Data are They Anyway
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,43 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |