Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

This Account Doesn't Exist

Tweet Decay and the Politics of Deletion in the Brexit Debate

Bibliographic Data

ID3759335
AuthorsM Bastos (0000-0003-0480-1078, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume65
Issue5
Pages757-773
Publication date2021-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0002764221989772
OpenAlexW3083305429
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited21

Literature on influence operations has identified metrics that are indicative of social media manipulation, but few studies have explored the lifecycle of low-quality information. We contribute to this literature by reconstructing nearly 3 million messages posted by 1 million users in the last days of the Brexit referendum campaign. While previous studies have found that on average only 4% of tweets disappear, we found that 33% of the tweets leading up to the referendum vote are no longer available. Only about half of the most active accounts that tweeted the referendum continue to operate publicly, and 20% of all accounts are no longer active. We tested whether partisan content was more likely to disappear and found more messages from the Leave campaign that disappeared than the entire universe of tweets affiliated with the Remain campaign. We compare these results with an assorted set of 45 hashtags posted in the same period and find that political campaigns present much higher ratios of user and tweet decay. These results are validated by inspecting 2 million Brexit-related tweets posted over a period of nearly 4 years. The article concludes with an overview of these findings and recommendations for future research

Advertising · Brexit · Business · European union · International trade · Period (music) · Political science · Politics · Quality (philosophy) · Referendum · Set (abstract data type) · Social media · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Social Media and Politics

  • Modeling Persuasion in Social Media

    Open Access•Massimo Terenzi•Journal of Sociocybernetics•2024

  • “This Tweet Is Unavailable”

    Open Access•Yiran Duan, Jeff Hemsley et al.•AoIR Selected Papers of Internet…•2023

  • We love to hate George Soros

    Open Access•Rose Marie Santini, Débora Salles et al.•Convergence The International…•2022

  • Message Deletion on Telegram

    Open Access•Kilian Buehling•Communication Methods and Measures•2023

  • Fact-Checking Misinformation

    Otávio Vinhas, M Bastos•Journalism Studies•2022

  • Fake news on the internet

    Open Access•Yuanyuan Wu, Eric W T Ngai et al.•Internet Research•2022

  • Challenges of and approaches to data collection across platforms and time

    Open Access•Annett Heft, Kilian Buehling et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2023

  • The Geopolitics of Deplatforming

    Open Access•Andreu Casas•Political Communication•2024

  • The Effectiveness of Random, Consecutive Day and Constructed Week Sampling in Newspaper Content Analysis

    Open Access•Daniel Riffe, Charles F Aust et al.•Journalism Quarterly•1993

  • The disinformation landscape and the lockdown of social platforms

    Shawn Walker, Dan Mercea et al.•Information Communication & Society•2019

  • Parametrizing Brexit

    M Bastos, Dan Mercea•Information Communication & Society•2018

  • Data craft

    Amelia Acker, Joan Donovan•Information Communication & Society•2019

  • Tents, Tweets, and Events

    Open Access•M Bastos, Marco T Bastos et al.•Journal of Communication•2015

  • The Russian "Firehose of Falsehood" Propaganda Model

    Christopher Paul, Miriam Matthews•2016

  • Disinformation as Collaborative Work

    Open Access•Kate Starbird, Ahmer Arif et al.•Proceedings of the ACM on…•2019

  • Rumors, False Flags, and Digital Vigilantes

    Kate Starbird, Jim Maddock et al.•iConference 2014 Proceedings•2014

  • Social bots distort the 2016 U.S. Presidential election online discussion

    Open Access•Alessandro Bessi, Emilio Ferrara•First Monday•2016

  • The Twitter Archive at the Library of Congress

    Open Access•Michael Zimmer•First Monday•2015

  • Disinformation and social bot operations in the run up to the 2017 French presidential election

    Open Access•Emilio Ferrara•First Monday•2017

  • Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism

    Open Access•Ronald Inglehart, P Norris•SSRN Electronic Journal•2016

  • The virtual sphere

    Open Access•Zizi Papacharissi•New Media & Society•2002

  • The Brexit Botnet and User-Generated Hyperpartisan News

    Open Access•M Bastos, Marco T Bastos et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2017

  • Witnessing absences

    Yiannis Mylonas•Social Identities•2017

  • Donald Trump Is My President

    Open Access•M Bastos, Johan Farkas•Social Media + Society•2019

Unique citing works8
Citations per year2
Citation span2022 - 2024 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae