The "Intensity" Problem and Democratic Theory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3763174 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Willmoore Kendall (University of Dallas), George W Carey (Georgetown University) |
| Year | 1968 |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 5-24 |
| Publication date | 1968-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Political Science Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1953323 |
| OpenAlex | W4254497894 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 19 |
| References cited | 3 |
Dinner is over. Mr. and Mrs. Jones and Mr. and Mrs. Smith are having coffee. The question arises: What shall we do this evening? Play bridge? Go to the movies? Listen to some chamber music from the local FM station? Sit and chat? Each, in due course, expresses a "preference" among these four alternatives but with this difference: Mr. and Mrs. Jones and Mrs. Smith, though each has a preference, "don't much care." Their preferences are "mild" or "marginal." Not so Mr. Smith. His preference is "strong." He is tired, couldn't possibly get his mind on bridge, or muster the energies for going out to a movie. He has listened to chamber music all afternoon while working on an architectural problem, and couldn't bear any more. If the group does anything other than sit and chat, he at least will do it grudgingly. He "cares enormously" which alternative is chosen.Now: which is the "correct" choice among the four alternatives? Which, "distributive justice" to one side, is the choice most likely to preserve good relations among the members of the group? Some theorists, it would seem, find these two questions easy to answer. Mr. Smith ought to have his way, and good relations are likely to be endangered if he does not; and these answers are equally valid whether the other three all prefer the same thing or prefer different things. Since, for the latter, the choice is a matter of indifference, it is both "more fair" and "more expedient" (less likely to lead to a quarrel) for the group to do what Mr. Smith prefers to do
Aesthetics · Bridge (graph theory · Economics · Evening · Preference · Medicine · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Social Psychology
Organized Interests and the Prospects of a Global Democracy
Contestation and participation
Establishing a Constitutional Court? An alternative political culture approach – the Israeli case
The multiple self in democracy
The Apsa and Minority Representation
Conceptualizing Bureaucratic Responsiveness
Demand functions and the valuation of public goods
Structural Sources of Unequal Responsiveness to Group Demands in American Cities
Why are small Island States Democracies
Nazis in Skokie
A Note On Social Cleavages and Democratic Performance
Size, Insularity and Democracy
Majoritarian and Consensus Democracy
The rise and decline of corporatism
On Analysing the Impact of the Electoral System on the Party System in Canada
The Limits of Consensual Decision
Direct Legislation
Justifying Justice
Local Organized Interests and the 1996 Cincinnati Sports Stadia Tax Referendum
| Unique citing works | 19 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,34 |
| Citation span | 1970 - 2025 (56) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 19 |