The Emancipation of Iraq from the Mandates System
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3765030 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Luther H Evans (0009-0006-5070-4542, Princeton University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1932 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 1024-1049 |
| Publication date | 1932-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Political Science Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1947698 |
| OpenAlex | W2073266698 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 1 |
The purpose of this article is to indicate how the competent authorities of the League of Nations came to accept the view that Iraq should be considered ready for the termination of the mandate, and how they worked out for the case of Iraq the detailed application of the general principles of mandate termination. The development of the general principles here applied for the first time is the subject of a separate study.The Iraq Mandate. Iraq was placed within the provisions of Article 22 of the League Covenant by the Council "decision" of September 27, 1924. By that decision, the Council adopted the treaty of alliance between Great Britain and Iraq, of October 10, 1922, and certain subsidiary agreements, as defining the relations of the mandatory and the mandated territory, and as giving effect to Article 22 of the Covenant. The decision provided that the British government should assume responsibility, toward all members of the League accepting the arrangement, for the fulfillment by Iraq of the terms of the treaty of alliance. Steps would be taken for the negotiation of such special extradition agreements as should be necessary. An annual report to the satisfaction of the Council should be made as to the measures taken during the year to carry out the provisions of the treaty of alliance, and copies of all laws and regulations promulgated during the year should be attached thereto. The British government undertook not to agree to any modification of the treaty of alliance without the consent of the Council. Disputes with members of the League not settled by negotiation should be referred to the Permanent Court of International Justice
Alliance · Covenant · Government (linguistics · League · Mandate · Negotiation · Political science · Treaty · Economic Sanctions and International Relations · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts · Public Administration
| Citations per year | 0.04 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1944 - 2025 (82) |
| Highly cited | No |