Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How to Make Impossible Decisions

Jacques Derrida and Ruth Chang on the Ethics of Rational Choice

Bibliographic Data

ID3774791
AuthorsCatherine M Robb (0000-0002-9249-1024, Tilburg University, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume29
Issue1-2
Pages181-191
Publication date2024-03-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAngelaki (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0969-725X • E-ISSN: 1469-2899
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0969725x.2024.2322280
OpenAlexW4396721880
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited7

In this paper, I propose that Derrida's writing on the impossibility of justice has the potential for fruitful dialogue with Ruth Chang's contemporary account of practical rationality. For Derrida, making a just decision must always come with a moment of undecidability, a "leap" into the unknown with an experience of doubt and anxiety that continues to "haunt" the decision-maker. By contrast, in her work on rationality, Chang proposes that hard decisions are difficult to make because the alternatives are "on a par," such that there are no rational differences between the alternatives that would contribute to choosing one over the other. Hard decisions are made by expressing one's own rational agency, generating will-based reasons to commit to or "drift" into one of the alternatives. Derrida writes of anxiety, doubt, and impossibility, yet Chang writes of commitment, agency, and rationality. Despite these differences, there are important comparisons and connections between the two accounts that are worth exploring. I suggest that the moment of the decision which Derrida describes as heterogeneous to knowledge can be understood as a moment of parity in which there is a lack of given reasons, as explained by Chang. Chang's account of rational agency provides an interpretation of how decision-making is possible despite the undecidability as described by Derrida. This notion of commitment and agency as explained by Chang is not incompatible with Derrida's insistence that the responsible decision is haunted by anxiety and doubt. Instead, I suggest that Derrida's writing highlights uncertainty as central to understanding the nature of hard choices and how to navigate the demands of justice

Aesthetics · Business · Epistemology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · History · Philosophy

  • Painting as an embodied act of framing

    Open Access•Lisa van Sorge•Man and World•2025

  • Deconstruction as a Research Strategy for Discourse Studies

    Open Access•Elizabeth Deborah Martínez Aguilar, Sjors Witje et al.•International Journal of…•2025

  • Transformative Choices

    Ruth Chang•Res Philosophica•2015

  • Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice

    David Carlson, Drucilla Cornell et al.•Deconstruction and the…•2016

  • A Moment of Madness

    Open Access•Geoffrey Bennington•Oxford Literary Review•2011

  • Philosophy as Autobiography

    Joseph G Kronick•Modern Language Notes•2000

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae