A Multiscalar Approach to Mapping Marginal Agricultural Land
Smallholder Agriculture in Malawi
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3775423 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Brad G Peters, B G Peter (0000-0002-5724-4482, Michigan State University), Joseph P Messina (0000-0002-1978-0778, Michigan State University), Sieglinde S Snapp (0000-0002-9738-0649, Michigan State University) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 108 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 989-1005 |
| Publication date | 2018-07-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Annals of the American Association of Geographers (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2469-4452 • E-ISSN: 2469-4460 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/24694452.2017.1403877 |
| OpenAlex | W2788866768 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 49 |
Marginal agricultural lands are defined here by suboptimal biophysical conditions and historically variable or low agricultural production. We characterize these areas using remotely sensed information to disentangle the biophysical and possible social factors driving marginality. Considering both the modifiable areal unit problem and the ecological fallacy problem, the heuristic we propose is generalizable across geographies and scales and provides information at multiple decision-making levels through a multiscalar interannual variability model. We present results from our study of Malawi, where the landscape is densely cultivated and smallholder farmers frequently occupy marginal lands, to illustrate the potential of a multiscalar analysis in a place where food insecurity alleviation is needed and where remote sensing can provide necessary information. Our framework for identifying marginal agricultural lands consists of (1) locating long-term agricultural land, (2) measuring interannual productivity of long-term farmed locations, and (3) assessing marginal biophysical land characteristics and the fundamental climate niche for the dominant crop (in this case maize). Productivity and marginality in Malawi are spatially organized, and an assessment of productivity at multiple scales highlights the importance of presenting both global and local spatiotemporal variability for managing agroecological variance. By disaggregating broad classes of historically marginal production and the underlying drivers of marginality, different intervention efforts can intelligently target areas most likely to receive maximum benefit. These methodologies can be applied by both policymakers and scholars to identify and target marginal agricultural areas for improved productivity and for the support of smallholder farmer livelihoods
Agricultural land · Agricultural productivity · Agriculture · Agroecology · Agroforestry · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental resource management · Food security · Geography · Land use · Livelihood · Marginal land · Marginal product · Natural resource economics · Productivity · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Climate change impacts on agriculture · Environmental Science · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Ecology
The yield gap of global grain production
Reframing the land‐sparing/land‐sharing debate for biodiversity conservation
Soil Fertility and Hunger in Africa
Input Subsidies to Improve Smallholder Maize Productivity in Malawi
The impact of climate change on smallholder and subsistence agriculture
Food Security
How does population density influence agricultural intensification and productivity? Evidence from Malawi
Analyzing Nutritional Impacts of Policies
Hierarchical marginal land assessment for land use planning
Large-scale agricultural investments under poor land governance in Zambia
Demographic response to environmental pressure in Malawi
International Yearbook of Cartography
Marginal land and the global land rush
Marginal lands
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |