Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How Smart Cities Became the Urban Norm

Power and Knowledge in New Songdo City

Bibliographic Data

ID3775526
AuthorsGlen David Kuecker (0000-0001-5522-2821, DePauw University), Kris Hartley (0000-0001-5349-0427, Education University of Hong Kong)
Year2020
Volume110
Issue2
Pages516-524
Publication date2020-03-03
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnnals of the American Association of Geographers (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2469-4452 • E-ISSN: 2469-4460
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/24694452.2019.1617102
OpenAlexW2955000549
LanguageEN
Citations received29
References cited36

In this article we ask why smart cities have emerged within the international development community as the normative urban logic for confronting systemic global crises. This phenomenon is exemplified by the embrace of smart cities as an implementation tool for UN Habitat’s aspirational New Urban Agenda. Our analysis deploys two theoretical approaches in novel combination. First, we reinterpret Foucault’s governmentality concept through the lens of Lefebvre’s planetary urbanization thesis. This approach reveals global crises and systemic instability as neglected lines of inquiry within the smart city discourse, particularly in scholarship that has viewed technocratic rationality and neoliberalism as primary mechanisms of capitalist reproduction. Our use of Lefebvre positions smart city governmentality within this neglected context. Our second theoretical approach goes beyond critical urban theory’s emphasis on social justice to consider its value in explaining rational-technocratic planning vis-à-vis Lefebvre’s “critical zone” of full planetary urbanization. We argue that smart cities represent an emergent form of critical zone urbanism. The article begins with a review of governmentality and planetary urbanization that establishes the foundation for the study’s case analysis of New Songdo City. We then analyze the Songdo project, its related actors and power brokers, and its evolution from test bed to implementation model that becomes the new urban norm. The conclusion synthesizes elements of the case and novel theoretical approach to highlight distinctions between cities as organically evolving entities and those as products of totalizing technocratic norms. Key Words: governmentality, planetary urbanization, smart cities

Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Governmentality · Normative · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Rationality · Smart city · Sociology · Technocracy · Urbanism · Urbanization · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development · Law · Smart Cities and Technologies · Urban Studies

  • From end-users to policy designers

    Open Access•Warathida Chaiyapa, Kris Hartley et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Smart energy systems beyond the age of Covid-19

    Open Access•Jörg Radtke•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Spatial Planning for Smart Sustainable Development

    Mee Kam Ng, Cecilia Wong•Planning Theory & Practice•2022

  • Frank FISCHER, Truth and Post-Truth in Public Policy

    Open Access•Kris Hartley•International Review of Public…•2022

  • Owning the libs

    Open Access•Kris Hartley•International Review of Public…•2023

  • The Epistemics of Policymaking

    Open Access•Kris Hartley•International Review of Public…•2020

  • Evolving spatialities of digital life

    Open Access•Casey R Lynch, Miriam E Sweeney•Digital Geography and Society•2024

  • Do smart cities perform better in governing the Covid-19 crisis? Empirical evidence from Indonesian cities

    Open Access•Arif Budy Pratama, Hina Amber et al.•Urban Governance•2023

  • How does a name shape a place? The performativity of urban branding in the case of Songdo, South Korea

    Haeran Shin, B Lee•Area Development and Policy•2023

  • Digitalisation and social inclusion in multi-scalar smart energy transitions

    Open Access•Sareen•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Technocratic and deliberative nexus in policy analysis

    Noe John Joseph E Sacramento, Piyapong Boossabong•Journal of Asian Public Policy•2021

  • Scoreboard Urbanism

    Open Access•M Patterson•City and Community•2023

  • The path-dependent nature of smart city policies in South Korea

    Open Access•Jung Won Sonn, Jaemin Song et al.•International Development…•2025

  • Promises of Urbanism

    Open Access•Anna Verena Eireiner•Space and Culture•2021

  • Smart urban governance

    Open Access•Huaxiong Jiang, Stan Geertman et al.•GeoJournal•2020

  • AI Urbanism, AI urbanismS

    Open Access•Jun Zhang, Andrew Cox et al.•Urban Geography•2026

  • Social challenges in smart cities

    Open Access•Behnam Ghasemzadeh, Samad Rasoulzadeh Aghdam et al.•Technology in Society•2025

  • Social science approaches to critical zone studies

    Open Access•Hsiaoping Chien, Loan Thi Phan et al.•Environment Development and…•2024

  • Public trust and support for government technology

    Open Access•Kris Hartley, Austin M Aldag et al.•Cities•2024

  • The utopian logics of “Smart Stockholm”

    Open Access•Marikken Wullf-Wathne•Cities•2024

  • Urban utopia or pipe dream? Examining Chinese-invested smart city development in Southeast Asia

    Yujia He, Angela Tritto•Third World Quarterly•2022

  • (Re)defining the smart city at national level? Coexisting narratives of urban sustainability governance in Germany

    Open Access•Leonie Büttner, Nele Kress•Urban Studies•2025

  • Urban planning and the knowledge politics of the smart city

    Open Access•Matthew Cook, Andy Karvonen•Urban Studies•2024

  • Smart and disruptive infrastructures

    Open Access•Kerry Bobbins, Federico Caprotti et al.•Urban Studies•2024

  • AIdeology

    Open Access•Federico Cugurullo•Antipode•2026

  • A comparison of comparisons

    Open Access•Kelly Ward, Teresa Abbruzzese et al.•Environment and Planning C…•2025

  • New cities in China

    Open Access•Max D Woodworth, Shiuh-Shen Chien et al.•Geography Compass•2022

  • Public Trust and Political Legitimacy in the Smart City

    Open Access•Kris Hartley•Science Technology & Human Values•2021

  • Public Perceptions About Smart Cities

    Open Access•Kris Hartley•Social Indicators Research•2023

  • Splintering Urbanism

    Steve Graham, Simon Marvin et al.•Splintering Urbanism•2002

  • Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning

    Paul Davidoff•Journal of the American Institute…•1965

  • Discipline and Punish

    Open Access•Michel Foucault•On Violence•2007

  • Discipline and Punish

    Michel Foucault, Simon Prebble•Surveiller et punir•2019

  • Resilience as embedded neoliberalism

    Open Access•Jonathan Joseph•Resilience•2013

  • The Concept of Cultural Hegemony

    T J Jackson Lears•The American Historical Review•1985

  • The Concept of Cultural Hegemony

    T J Jackson Lears•The American Historical Review•1985

  • The New Urban Agenda

    Open Access•Federico Caprotti, Roger Cowley et al.•Urban Research & Practice•2017

  • The Order of Things

    Michel Foucault•The Order of Things•2018

  • A Model Korean Ubiquitous Eco-City? The Politics of Making Songdo

    Sofia T Shwayri•Journal of Urban Technology•2013

  • What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program

    Open Access•B Guy Peters•Policy and Society•2017

  • A new urban agenda

    Open Access•David Satterthwaite•Environment and Urbanization•2016

  • From Habitat II to Pachamama

    Open Access•Michael A Cohen•Environment and Urbanization•2015

  • Neo-liberalism

    W Larner•Studies in Political Economy•2000

  • The Triumph of the City

    Open Access•Paul E Hodges, Scott Alan Carson•The Social Science Journal•2012

  • The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism

    Open Access•Rob Kitchin•GeoJournal•2013

  • The Urban Question

    S G CHECKLAND•Urban Studies•1978

  • Beheading the King and Enthroning the Market

    Open Access•Derek Kerr•Science & Society•1999

  • Foucault and neo-liberalism

    Open Access•David Hancock, David W Hancock•Contemporary Political Theory•2017

  • What is critical urban theory

    Neil Brenner•City•2009

  • Smartmentality

    Open Access•Alberto Vanolo•Urban Studies•2013

  • Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique

    Open Access•T Lemke•Rethinking Marxism•2002

  • Why India Cannot Plan Its Cities

    Open Access•Ananya Roy•Planning Theory•2009

  • The Urban Revolution

    V Gordon Childe•Town Planning Review•1950

  • Michel Foucault and the Smart City

    Open Access•F Klauser, Till F Paasche et al.•Environment and Planning D…•2014

  • Reconceptualising urbanism, ecology and networked infrastructures

    Mark Swilling•Social Dynamics•2011

  • Encountering Development

    Arturo Escobar•Encountering Development•2012

  • Seeing Like a State

    James C Scott•Seeing Like a State•2017

  • Test-Bed Urbanism

    Orit Halpern, Jesse LeCavalier et al.•Public Culture•2013

  • The Global University, Area Studies, and the World Citizen

    Open Access•Tom Looser•Cultural Anthropology•2012

  • Spatializing States

    Open Access•James Ferguson, Akhil Gupta•American Ethnologist•2002

Citations per year4.83
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae