How Smart Cities Became the Urban Norm
Power and Knowledge in New Songdo City
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3775526 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Glen David Kuecker (0000-0001-5522-2821, DePauw University), Kris Hartley (0000-0001-5349-0427, Education University of Hong Kong) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 110 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 516-524 |
| Publication date | 2020-03-03 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Annals of the American Association of Geographers (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2469-4452 • E-ISSN: 2469-4460 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/24694452.2019.1617102 |
| OpenAlex | W2955000549 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 29 |
| References cited | 36 |
In this article we ask why smart cities have emerged within the international development community as the normative urban logic for confronting systemic global crises. This phenomenon is exemplified by the embrace of smart cities as an implementation tool for UN Habitat’s aspirational New Urban Agenda. Our analysis deploys two theoretical approaches in novel combination. First, we reinterpret Foucault’s governmentality concept through the lens of Lefebvre’s planetary urbanization thesis. This approach reveals global crises and systemic instability as neglected lines of inquiry within the smart city discourse, particularly in scholarship that has viewed technocratic rationality and neoliberalism as primary mechanisms of capitalist reproduction. Our use of Lefebvre positions smart city governmentality within this neglected context. Our second theoretical approach goes beyond critical urban theory’s emphasis on social justice to consider its value in explaining rational-technocratic planning vis-à-vis Lefebvre’s “critical zone” of full planetary urbanization. We argue that smart cities represent an emergent form of critical zone urbanism. The article begins with a review of governmentality and planetary urbanization that establishes the foundation for the study’s case analysis of New Songdo City. We then analyze the Songdo project, its related actors and power brokers, and its evolution from test bed to implementation model that becomes the new urban norm. The conclusion synthesizes elements of the case and novel theoretical approach to highlight distinctions between cities as organically evolving entities and those as products of totalizing technocratic norms. Key Words: governmentality, planetary urbanization, smart cities
Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Governmentality · Normative · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Rationality · Smart city · Sociology · Technocracy · Urbanism · Urbanization · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development · Law · Smart Cities and Technologies · Urban Studies
From end-users to policy designers
Smart energy systems beyond the age of Covid-19
Spatial Planning for Smart Sustainable Development
Frank FISCHER, Truth and Post-Truth in Public Policy
Owning the libs
The Epistemics of Policymaking
Evolving spatialities of digital life
Do smart cities perform better in governing the Covid-19 crisis? Empirical evidence from Indonesian cities
How does a name shape a place? The performativity of urban branding in the case of Songdo, South Korea
Digitalisation and social inclusion in multi-scalar smart energy transitions
Technocratic and deliberative nexus in policy analysis
Scoreboard Urbanism
The path-dependent nature of smart city policies in South Korea
Promises of Urbanism
Smart urban governance
AI Urbanism, AI urbanismS
Social challenges in smart cities
Social science approaches to critical zone studies
Public trust and support for government technology
The utopian logics of “Smart Stockholm”
Urban utopia or pipe dream? Examining Chinese-invested smart city development in Southeast Asia
(Re)defining the smart city at national level? Coexisting narratives of urban sustainability governance in Germany
Urban planning and the knowledge politics of the smart city
Smart and disruptive infrastructures
AIdeology
A comparison of comparisons
New cities in China
Public Trust and Political Legitimacy in the Smart City
Public Perceptions About Smart Cities
Splintering Urbanism
Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning
Discipline and Punish
Discipline and Punish
Resilience as embedded neoliberalism
The Concept of Cultural Hegemony
The Concept of Cultural Hegemony
The New Urban Agenda
The Order of Things
A Model Korean Ubiquitous Eco-City? The Politics of Making Songdo
What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program
A new urban agenda
From Habitat II to Pachamama
Neo-liberalism
The Triumph of the City
The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism
The Urban Question
Beheading the King and Enthroning the Market
Foucault and neo-liberalism
What is critical urban theory
Smartmentality
Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique
Why India Cannot Plan Its Cities
The Urban Revolution
Michel Foucault and the Smart City
Reconceptualising urbanism, ecology and networked infrastructures
Encountering Development
Seeing Like a State
Test-Bed Urbanism
The Global University, Area Studies, and the World Citizen
Spatializing States
| Citations per year | 4.83 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Highly cited | No |