The Smart City Conundrum for Social Justice

Youth Perspectives on Digital Technologies and Urban Transformations

Bibliographic Data

ID3775868
AuthorsMichele Masucci (0000-0001-7220-2961, Temple University), Hamil Pearsall (0000-0003-2287-7586, Temple University), Alan Wiig (0000-0002-6224-2633, University of Massachusetts Boston)
Year2020
Volume110
Issue2
Pages476-484
Publication date2020-03-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnnals of the American Association of Geographers (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2469-4452 • E-ISSN: 2469-4460
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/24694452.2019.1617101
OpenAlexW2953736594
LanguageEN
Citations received22
References cited21

This article employs a social justice framing to examine youth perspectives of the smart city. We examine how youth understand the impact of digital technologies on urban transformations and whether their technology skills and digital literacy give them a sense of ownership over the future of their city. Research was conducted within the context of a six-week summer educational program involving seventy-nine youth of color from public high schools in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The program mixed digital skill building with urban fieldwork to prototype solutions to long-standing urban problems: the sort of problems that smart city policies also seek to change. Our research points to a conundrum for youth. Although they embraced technological innovations, they indicated that digital technologies failed to serve the public or address pressing concerns they identified as problematic within the city: crime, drugs, and homelessness. Instead, in their view, digital technologies delivered the most benefit to private spaces in the home and workplace. Furthermore, the youth did not envision that emergent technologies would improve their neighborhoods or communities but only their employment prospects. This research suggests that the emergent smart city is reproducing actual as well as perceived urban inequities: Wealthy residential neighborhoods and spaces of the new economy become “smart,” but much of the city remains left behind. These patterns create a paradox for youth who invest in digital skills while remaining on the margins of technology-driven, smart urban change. Key Words: digital divide, Philadelphia, smart city, social justice, youth

Economic growth · Economic Justice · Geography · Internet privacy · Literacy · Pedagogy · Political science · Public relations · Smart city · Sociology · Urban planning · Engineering · Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development · Smart Cities and Technologies

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub