Results of an explorative empirical study on human mating in Germany
Handsome men, not high-status men, succeed in courtship
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3779025 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alexander Pashos (Max Planck Society), Carsten Niemitz |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 331-341 |
| Publication date | 2003-09-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Anthropologischer Anzeiger (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-5548 • E-ISSN: 2363-7099 |
| Publisher | S ch we iz er ba rt (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1127/anthranz/61/2003/331 |
| PMID | 14524006 |
| OpenAlex | W2410470161 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 11 |
Recent research on human mating depicts men as searching for physical attractiveness (PA) and women as searching for status. To identify the mechanisms which lead to universal, biologically interpretable structures in social processes, we focused on the proximate causes for inter- and intrasexual differences in human mating preferences, attraction, and tactics. We collected data on 180 young singles (mean age 26.9 years) without a steady relationship. A questionnaire and a video sequence (20-30 seconds) of each subject was taken. Next, each video sequence was rated by approximately 20 individuals of the opposite sex, who also participated in this study. Surprisingly, the answers given by male and female subjects regarding sociosexual behaviour and mating preferences are predominantly congruent. Sex differences among preferences for good looking and high-status partners were small or even insignificant. Lower educated subjects had considerably higher status preferences than higher educated individuals. In both sexes, PA was much more preferred in a potential partner than status. For both sexes, physical appearance was decisive for the subject's dating attractiveness. Male, but not female dating attractiveness also correlates with a kind and charismatic appearance. Furthermore, there was a positive linear relationship between men's PA and their number of sexual partners within the last year. Men with more than four sexual partners were all above-average in PA, while the most attractive women had a medium number of sexual partners. However, in this respect, status had no influence. The results show that sex differences in mating are more complex than hitherto assumed.
Attractiveness · Biology · Courtship · Developmental psychology · Mating · Physical attractiveness · Sexual attraction · Sexual behavior · Sexual selection · Sociology · Zoology · Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification · Demography · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Psychology · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology · Social Psychology
Parental Investment and Sexual Selection
Physical attractiveness, social relations, and personality style
Physical attractiveness and dating choice
Physical attractiveness in social interaction
Social or evolutionary theories? Some observations on preferences in human mate selection
Continuity between the experimental study of attraction and real-life computer dating
Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior
Mate choice in modern societies
Gender differences in mate selection preferences
The Dynamics of Sexual Behavior of College Students
Sex Differences in Dating Aspirations and Satisfaction with Computer-Selected Partners
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |