Were ancient seals secure
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3780452 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Roger G Johnston (Los Alamos National Laboratory), Debbie D Martinez (Los Alamos National Laboratory), Anthony R E Garcia |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 75 |
| Issue | 288 |
| Pages | 299-305 |
| Publication date | 2001-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Antiquity (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-598X • E-ISSN: 1745-1744 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0003598x00060944 |
| OpenAlex | W929205205 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 7 |
Forgeries of ancient seals have been found in modern times, but there has been little previous analysis of how much security ancient seals might have offered. In this paper, we demonstrate four different vulnerabilities of clay seal impressions using attack methods and materials that were available thousands of years ago. The success of these attacks suggests that ancient stamp and cylinder seals may have been highly vulnerable to spoofing
Ancient history · Archaeology · Computer security · Seal (emblem) · Spoofing attack · Computer Science · Digital and Cyber Forensics · Forensic and Genetic Research · Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods · Geology · History · Paleontology
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.1 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2016 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |