Kurdistan's Referendum
The Withdrawal of the Kurdish Forces in Kirkuk
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3790962 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hawre Hasan Hama (0000-0003-1787-0718), Farhad Hassan Abdulla |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 364-383 |
| Publication date | 2019-05-27 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Asian Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0306-8374 • E-ISSN: 1477-1500 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03068374.2019.1636522 |
| OpenAlex | W2963377392 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
Less than a month after the Kurdistan independence referendum, the Iraqi Army and units of the Popular Mobilisation Forces (PMF) attacked the disputed province of Kirkuk on October, 16, 2017. Unlike most national defence forces, the Kurdish Peshmerga is divided along partisan lines between the two largest parties in Iraqi Kurdistan. This particular area was largely under the control of units affiliated with the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), which decided to make a strategic withdrawal in the face of superior numbers and firepower. The city was then retaken in short order by forces loyal to Baghdad, as were all other disputed territories previously under Kurdish control. Subsequently, the allegation that the PUK had retreated too easily has been described by the rival Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and others as a betrayal of the Kurdish people by the PUK. This has created two competing post-event perspectives: first, that the Peshmerga forces should have defended Kirkuk to the last man and should not have left their front line trenches; second that the withdrawal of the Peshmerga was a deliberate and rational military reaction to overwhelming opposition. This article critically assesses both perspectives and finds that partisan divisions in the Peshmerga critically undermined the ability of Kurdish forces to defend the disputed areas that they controlled. Instead of serving as motivation of create a unified fighting force, the loss of Kirkuk has only served to deepen those divisions
Ancient history · Democracy · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Referendum · Sociology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · History · Law · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East · Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
The Cambridge History of the Kurds
The History of Kurdish and the Development of Literary Kurmanji
Water and Ethnic Conflict in Iraq’s Internal Frontier
Oil or State? The Role of the Oil in the Recognition of Kurdish Statehood in Iraqi Kurdistan
Everyday peace and conflict
The Impact of Gender Inequality on Iraq’s Environmental Activism
Securitization of the 2017 Kurdistan independence referendum
Iraqi Kurds
KDP-PUK Strategic Agreement and Its Consequences for the Governing System in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq
| Citations per year | 1.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Highly cited | No |