Who Owns India's History? A Critique of Shashi Tharoor's Inglorious Empire
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3791010 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Charles Allen (0000-0003-4067-7596, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 355-369 |
| Publication date | 2018-07-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Asian Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0306-8374 • E-ISSN: 1477-1500 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03068374.2018.1487685 |
| OpenAlex | W2886974392 |
| Language | EN |
The historiography of Britain's colonial past has always been problematic, shaped by conflicting mythologies about Britain's role as benefactor or exploiter. In the wake of Indian independence in 1947 it was in the interests of India's national identity to present what had gone before as a period of unmitigated oppression challenged by a united people. The consequence was widespread ignorance about the realities of British rule and of the Indian economy prior to and after British rule, exemplified by a current best-seller written by a well-known Indian political figure, Dr Shashi Tharoor, whose main arguments are examined; in particular, his central claim that India was a wealthy nation prior to Britain's colonial intervention reduced to poverty by Britain's ‘depredations
Ancient history · British Empire · Colonial rule · Colonialism · Decolonization · Economic history · Empire · Historiography · Identity (music · Ignorance · Independence (probability theory · Indirect rule · Mythology · Oppression · Political science · Politics · Poverty · Sociology · Classics · Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies · History · Law · Philosophy · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East · Social and Economic Development in India
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |