Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Genetic Bodily Fragments and Relational Embodiment

Judicial Rhetoric about 'Biological Truth' in Paternity Disputes in the Family Courts

Bibliographic Data

ID3803076
AuthorsHannah Robert (0000-0002-4243-1242, Schlumberger (Ireland), corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume45
Issue1
Pages63-90
Publication date2019-01-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Feminist Law Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1320-0968 • E-ISSN: 2204-0064
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13200968.2019.1646111
OpenAlexW2990483304
LanguageEN
Citations received5

In an era of quick, cheap and readily available genetic heredity testing, the Family Courts are increasingly asked to determine legal parentage in light of DNA evidence. For the children involved, that can mean that their genetic bodily fragments are used to retrospectively ‘correct’ their legal kinship relationships and legal identity. Where genetic paternity has been misattributed, judges have erased children’s legal connections with misattributed fathers (and their kin) from birth certificates irrespective of any social and relational meaning that these relationships and identities may have accumulated. This article critiques the genetic thinking apparent in family law judgments on legal parentage. It draws on theories of embodiment to argue that judges use a rhetoric of ‘biotruth’ to engage with the child’s body only as genetic fragments. In reconstructing children’s ‘true’ legal parentage and identity from their genetic fragments, law disembodies children themselves, relating to them as evidence of a reproductive transaction in which men who did not get the genetic child they bargained for may be able to obtain a refund of child support paid. In doing so, the current model of legal parentage fails to engage with the children involved in these disputes as embodied and relational legal persons

Biology · Heredity · Kinship · Political science · Rhetoric · Sociology · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Genetics

  • Safeguarding Sex

    Open Access•Kristin Bergtora Sandvik, Jasmine-Kim Westendorf•Global Studies Quarterly•2023

  • Spanish Legal Reproscape

    Open Access•Itziar Alkorta•Law Technology and Humans•2021

  • Alice Margaria, The Construction of Fatherhood

    Open Access•Robert Leckey•Social & Legal Studies•2021

  • Are we ready for the genomic era? Insights from judges and lawyers

    Open Access•Fatos Selita, Robert M Chapman et al.•New Genetics and Society•2024

  • Beyond secrecy and openness

    Open Access•D Dempsey, P Nordqvist et al.•BioSocieties•2022

Citations per year1
Citation span2021 - 2024 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae