No limiar do mundo
A posição de Heidegger sobre a diferença entre animais e humanos
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3820104 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fernando Rodrigues (0000-0001-8436-9398, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), corresponding author) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 0 |
| Issue | 14 |
| Pages | 31 |
| Publication date | 2009-11-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cadernos de Filosofia Alemã Crítica e Modernidade (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1413-7860 • E-ISSN: 2318-9800 |
| Publisher | Universidade de Sao Paulo, Agencia USP de Gestao da Informacao Academica (AGUIA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v0i14p31-53 |
| OpenAlex | W2065016847 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
Heidegger’s position on the difference between man and animal is often taken as non-scientific or even conservative. This is also Peter Sloterdijk’s view, as defended in his essay Regeln für den Menschenpark. In this paper we intend to show how a due understanding of Heidegger’s statements depends on a proper understanding of the concepts of transcendence, world and world-forming, as explained in Being and Time (1927) and in his The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics (1929/30). By doing so, we may prove that the description offered by Sloterdijk in its Regeln tends to simplify the complex horizon of problems wherein Heidegger moves when he defends a radical difference between man and animal, and thus we intend to show how Sloterdijk’s interpretation of Heidegger is in itself restricted
Epistemology · Metaphysics · Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy · Philosophy · Philosophy and Historical Thought · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |