Quem delibera na esfera pública? A crítica da "filosofia do sujeito" como passo para uma democratização da teoria crítica
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3820160 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Adriana Pereira Matos (0000-0001-7874-9730, Universidade de São Paulo, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 51-70 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cadernos de Filosofia Alemã Crítica e Modernidade (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1413-7860 • E-ISSN: 2318-9800 |
| Publisher | Universidade de São Paulo. Agência de Bibliotecas e Coleções Digitais (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v30i2p51-70 |
| OpenAlex | W4413966628 |
| Language | PT |
In Critique, Norm, and Utopia, Benhabib reconstructs central points in the works of Hegel, Marx, Adorno and Horkheimer to criticize the conception of the subject that would have been maintained over time in the tradition of critical theory. The intention of this article is to present the critique of the "philosophy of the subject", going through the overcoming of several of these problems with the "Habermasian turn", seeking to show, finally, how Benhabib considers that these transformations gave a democratic meaning to the emancipatory ideals of the tradition
Humanities · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Philosophy · Social and Economic Solidarity · Social and Political Issues
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |