Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Quem delibera na esfera pública? A crítica da "filosofia do sujeito" como passo para uma democratização da teoria crítica

Bibliographic Data

ID3820160
AuthorsAdriana Pereira Matos (0000-0001-7874-9730, Universidade de São Paulo, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume30
Issue2
Pages51-70
Publication date2025-09-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCadernos de Filosofia Alemã Crítica e Modernidade (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1413-7860 • E-ISSN: 2318-9800
PublisherUniversidade de São Paulo. Agência de Bibliotecas e Coleções Digitais (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v30i2p51-70
OpenAlexW4413966628
LanguagePT

In Critique, Norm, and Utopia, Benhabib reconstructs central points in the works of Hegel, Marx, Adorno and Horkheimer to criticize the conception of the subject that would have been maintained over time in the tradition of critical theory. The intention of this article is to present the critique of the "philosophy of the subject", going through the overcoming of several of these problems with the "Habermasian turn", seeking to show, finally, how Benhabib considers that these transformations gave a democratic meaning to the emancipatory ideals of the tradition

Humanities · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Philosophy · Social and Economic Solidarity · Social and Political Issues

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae