Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Optimal categorisation

The Nature of Nominal Classification Systems

Bibliographic Data

ID3821512
AuthorsAlexandra Grandison (0000-0001-9396-6274, University of Surrey), Michael Franjieh (0000-0002-7832-0907, University of Surrey), Lily Greene (University of Surrey), Greville G Corbett (0000-0002-2667-9870, University of Surrey)
Year2021
Volume2
Issue1
Pagese393
Publication date2021-12-03
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCadernos de Linguística e Teoria da Literatura (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais) (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2675-4916 • E-ISSN: 2675-4916
PublisherAssociacao Brasileira de Linguistica (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.25189/2675-4916.2021.v2.n1.id393
OpenAlexW4200326322
LanguageEN
References cited51

The debate as to whether language influences cognition has been long standing but has yielded conflicting findings across domains such as colour and kinship categories. Fewer studies have investigated systems such as nominal classification (gender, classifiers) across different languages to examine the effects of linguistic categorisation on cognition. Effective categorisation needs to be informative to maximise communicative efficiency but also simple to minimise cognitive load. It therefore seems plausible to suggest that different systems of nominal classification have implications for the way speakers conceptualise relevant entities. A suite of seven experiments was designed to test this; here we focus on our card sorting experiment, which contains two sub-tasks - a free sort and a structured sort. Participants were 119 adults across six Oceanic languages from Vanuatu and New Caledonia, with classifier inventories ranging from two to 23. The results of the card sorting experiment reveal that classifiers appear to provide structure for cognition in tasks where they are explicit and salient. The free sort task did not incite categorisation through classifiers, arguably as it required subjective judgement, rather than explicit instruction. This was evident from our quantitative and qualitative analyses. Furthermore, the languages employing more extreme categorisation systems displayed smaller variation in comparison to more moderate systems. Thus, systems that are more informative or more rigid appear to be more efficient. The study implies that the influence of language on cognition may vary across languages, and that not all nominal classification systems employ this optimal trade-off between simplicity and informativeness. These novel data provide a new perspective on the origin and nature of nominal classification

Card sorting · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Judgement · Natural language processing · Salient · Simplicity · sort · Sorting · Categorization, perception, and language · Computer Science · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Multisensory perception and integration · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • Words and the Mind

    Barbara C Malt, Barbara Malt et al.•Private Speech, Executive…•2010

  • Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars

    John A Hawkins•Efficiency and complexity in…•2004

  • Twelve tips for conducting qualitative research interviews

    Open Access•Cormac McGrath, Per J Palmgren et al.•Medical Teacher•2019

  • When language affects cognition and when it does not

    Maria D Sera, Chryle Elieff et al.•Journal of Experimental…•2002

  • Effects of Language on Visual Perception

    Open Access•Gary Lupyan, Rasha Abdel Rahman et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2020

  • Kinship Categories Across Languages Reflect General Communicative Principles

    Open Access•Candace Kemp, Charles Kemp et al.•Science•2012

  • Color categories are not universal

    Dawne Roberson, Ioan Davies et al.•Journal of Experimental…•2000

  • Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination

    Open Access•Jonathan Winawer, Nathan Witthoft et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2007

  • Language, thought, and color

    Open Access•Terry Regier, Paul Kay•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2009

  • Sex, Syntax, and Semantics

    Lera Boroditsky, Lauren Schmidt et al.•Language in Mind•2003

  • Thematic Analysis

    G Terry, Nikki Hayfield et al.•The Sage Handbook of Qualitative…•2017

  • Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches

    Open Access•Braun, Victoria Clarke•Counselling and Psychotherapy…•2021

  • Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1

    Open Access•Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2009

  • Culture or language

    Open Access•Sieghard Beller, Karen Fadnes Brattebø et al.•Cognitive Linguistics•2015

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • Gender and classifiers in concurrent systems

    Open Access•Sebastian Fedden, Greville G Corbett•Glossa a journal of general…•2017

  • Semantic Typology and Efficient Communication

    Candace Kemp, Yang Xu et al.•Annual Review of Linguistics•2018

  • Extreme classification

    Open Access•Sebastian Fedden, Greville G Corbett•Cognitive Linguistics•2018

  • Linguistic relativism and colour cognition

    Open Access•Michael Pilling, Ian R L Davies et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2004

  • Order in Spanish colour words

    Open Access•Ana R Delgado•British Journal of Psychology•2004

  • A study in language and cognition

    Roger W Brown, Roger Brown et al.•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1954

  • Relational classifiers

    Open Access•Frantisek Lichtenberk•Lingua•1983

  • Thematic Analysis

    Open Access•Lorelli Nowell, Jill M Norris et al.•International Journal of…•2017

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae