"Plug into Choice"? The Trouble with Common-Sense Participation in a Smart Electric Grid
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3834945 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Heather Rosenfeld (Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 87-108 |
| Publication date | 2018-07-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Capitalism Nature Socialism (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1045-5752 • E-ISSN: 1548-3290 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10455752.2017.1296013 |
| OpenAlex | W2592080505 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 38 |
Smart electric grids add digital technologies to the grid. While some suggest that they offer many environmental and social benefits, others remain critical and call them a neoliberal project. Considering smart grids a boundary object [Star, Susan L., and James R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, Translations and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420], I examine how multiple social groups come together in cooperation and conflict in the installation of one smart grid. In what follows, I first argue that participation is Gramscian common sense (1971), a taken-for-granted good in producing a smart grid. Gramsci points out that common sense can be used to reinforce oppressive ideologies of a hegemonic status quo, but that it also contains “good sense” that can be developed into counter-hegemonic narratives and movements. Second, I argue that in the course of cooperation and conflict, the smart grid indeed becomes more neoliberal, and this occurs through participation. While the utility often seeks or accepts public participation, the meaning of participation gradually becomes limited to individualistic and financially motivated “choice.” In the discussed case, many of the (less neoliberal) social and environmental benefits of the grid and more collectivist forms of participation were precluded. This article offers a grounded examination of a smart grid and a sympathetic critique of common-sense participation
Business · Common sense · Electrical engineering · Grid · Political science · Sense (electronics · Smart grid · Engineering · Law · Mathematics · Water Governance and Infrastructure
Splintering Urbanism
Constructions of Neoliberal Reason
Refining Expertise
Gramsci, Nature, and the Philosophy of Praxis
Biofuels, Ex-felons, and Empower, a Worker-Owned Cooperative
Volunteers, Nimbys, and Environmental Justice
Wireless smart meters and public acceptance
Selections from the Prison Notebooks
Defining Environmental Justice
Race and the Education of Desire
The Gramscian Moment
The Neoliberal Politics of “Smart”
Society Must Be Defended’
Foucault, Michel . Abnormal
The ‘actually existing smart city’
Producing the Post-Fordist Public
Neo-liberalism
Small technologies, big change
Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects
The Pervasive Nature of Heterodox Economic Spaces at a Time of Neoliberal Crisis
Working the Spaces of Neoliberal Subjectivity
The rise and transformation of the Brazilian landless movement into a counter-hegemonic political actor
The dilemma of decontamination
Rethinking Environmental Racism
Programming Environments
Citizenship and the problem of community
Beyond Distribution and Proximity
Subalternity and Language
Diverse economies
This is Not a Boundary Object
Protesting Mobile Phone Masts
Michel Foucault and the Smart City
Mapping Economic Diversity in the First World
The End of Capitalism (as we knew it)
The birth of bio-politics
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2023 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |