John Rokycana-Church Reformer between Hus and Luther
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3839987 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Frederick G Heymann (University of Alberta, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1959 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 240-280 |
| Publication date | 1959-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Church History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0009-6407 • E-ISSN: 1755-2613 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3162158 |
| OpenAlex | W2163585016 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 2 |
There are four men whom popular tradition, and the builders of Luther's monument in Worms, have grouped around the figure of the Wittenberg reformer as his greatest forerunners: Peter Waldo, Savonarola, Wyclyf and Hus. Luther himself considered only the last named as a man to whom he was indebted, and with whose teachings he could increasingly identify himself, at least after he wrote that famous letter to Spalatin in February 1520 in which he claimed, half-correctly, that he had always held the whole doctrine of Hus without having even been aware of it. But what, in the consciousness of present historiography, is the relation between the heritage of Hus, the whole vast movement called Hussitism, and the Lutheran reformation
Archaeology · Consciousness · Doctrine · Epistemology · Historiography · Martin luther · Relation (database) · Theology · Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics · History · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
| Citations per year | 0.07 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1968 - 2011 (44) |
| Highly cited | No |