John Wyclif and the Eucharistic Words of Institution
Context and Aftermath
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3840271 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ian Christopher Levy (0000-0001-9517-1512, Providence College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 90 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 21-44 |
| Publication date | 2021-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Church History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0009-6407 • E-ISSN: 1755-2613 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0009640721000731 |
| OpenAlex | W3180853712 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 8 |
In matters of eucharistic theology, John Wyclif (d. 1384) is best known for his rejection of the scholastic doctrine of transubstantiation. There were many reasons why Wyclif came to regard this doctrine as fundamentally untenable, such as the impossibility of substantial annihilation and the illogicality of accidents existing apart from subjects, but chief among them was his deep dissatisfaction with the prevailing interpretation of Christ's words, "Hoc est corpus meum," the words of institution required to confect the sacrament in the Mass. Wyclif insisted that getting this proposition right was essential for a correct understanding of Christ's presence in the Eucharist. This article presents Wyclif's position on this matter within the context of later medieval scholastic discussions in an effort to lend clarity to his larger understanding of eucharistic presence. The article will then trace the reception of Wyclif's ideas to Bohemia at the turn of the fifteenth century, with special attention given to the Prague master Jakoubek of Stříbro. One finds that Wyclif, and then later Jakoubek, developed new and effective means of conceptualizing the conversion of the eucharistic elements, thereby expanding the ways in which one can affirm Christ's presence in the consecrated host and the salvific effects of that presence for faithful communicants
Context (archaeology) · Doctrine · Epistemology · Eucharist · Impossibility · Institution · Interpretation (philosophy) · Linguistics · Political science · Proposition · Theology · Classics · Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies · History · Law · Medieval Literature and History · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
| Highly cited | No |
|---|