Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Antipolitics and the Administrative State

Bibliographic Data

ID3850130
AuthorsCary Coglianese (0000-0002-5496-2104), Daniel E Walters (0000-0001-9639-2739)
Year2023
Volume29
Issue3
Pages367-382
Publication date2023-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCommon Knowledge (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0961-754X • E-ISSN: 1538-4578
PublisherDuke University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1215/0961754x-10862563
OpenAlexW4396920978
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited38

This contribution to the Common Knowledge symposium "Antipolitics" A considers what it might mean for the administrative state to be antipolitical. Two conceptions of an antipolitical administrative state are identified. The first of these-antipolitics as in opposition to administrative discretion-holds that, in a democracy, value judgments should be made only by elected officials and that all administrators should do is carry out technical tasks calling for expertise. Administrators, however, inevitably make policy decisions that call for value judgments, making this first conception unattainable. On the other hand, a second conception or standard-one of antipolitics as in opposition to favoritism-is both realistic and desirable to expect of those who occupy positions of administrative power. It holds that administrators should avoid making decisions for self-interested reasons. Many doctrines of administrative law follow from aversion to favoritism, as the law aspires to free the administrative state from decision-making that is based on the interests of administrators and their partisan overseers or friends. Today, as the state comes under increasing threat from populist and authoritarian attempts to capture its power, distinguishing between these two conceptions of antipolitics-one unrealistic, the other imperative-can help to channel antipolitical impulses where they are most needed

Programming language · Computer Science · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies

  • Miller Versus College of Policing

    Open Access•J Welsh•Administration & Society•2026

  • The Reasoning State

    Open Access•Edward H Stiglitz•Reasoning State•2022

  • When the People Speak

    James S Fishkin, James Fishkin•When the People Speak•2011

  • The Politics of Presidential Appointments

    David E Lewis•Politics of Presidential…•2008

  • The Theory of Economic Regulation

    George J Stigler•The Bell Journal of Economics and…•1971

  • Economy and Society

    Claus Wittich, Guenther Roth et al.•Economy and Society•2013

  • A systems analysis of political life

    David Easton•A systems analysis of political…•1979

  • The Rise of Political Disenchantment

    Open Access•Gerry Stoker•New Directions in Political Science•2010

  • Symmetry's Mandate

    Daniel E Walters, Daniel Walters•Michigan Law Review•2020

  • Anti-System Politics

    Jonathan Hopkins, Jonathan Hopkin•Anti-System Politics•2020

  • Saving the Freedom of Information Act

    Open Access•Margaret B Kwoka•Saving the Freedom of Information…•2021

  • Politics

    Erich Fromm•Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung•1937

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Rachelle Beveridge, David Featherstone•Environment and Planning C…•2021

  • Inside the Black Box

    Open Access•William F West•Administration & Society•2009

  • New Democracy

    Open Access•Kenneth Lipartito•Journal of American History•2024

  • Weberian Bureaucracy and Contemporary Governance

    Open Access•Donald F Kettl•Perspectives on Public Management…•2021

  • Public Management for Populists

    Open Access•Donald P Moynihan•Public Administration Review•2021

  • Politicisation, Depoliticisation and Anti-Politics

    Open Access•Matthew Wood•Political Studies Review•2016

  • Control without Confirmation

    Open Access•Christina M Kinane•American Political Science Review•2021

  • The Study of Administration

    Open Access•Woodrow Wilson•Political Science Quarterly•1887

  • Three Contemporary Imaginaries of Sortition

    Nabila Abbas, Yves Sintomer•Common Knowledge•2022

  • Suffocation in the Polis

    Jeffrey M Perl•Common Knowledge•2019

  • Introduction

    Jeffrey M Perl, Jeffrey Perl•Common Knowledge•2022

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae