Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How Does Nature Deify Us

Bibliographic Data

ID3873899
AuthorsMichael J Blouin (0009-0008-2502-1867, Milligan College, corresponding author), Morgan Shipley (0000-0001-6456-9528, Michigan State University)
Year2022
Volume22
Issue2
Pages161-203
Publication date2022-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCR The New Centennial Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1532-687X • E-ISSN: 1539-6630
PublisherMichigan State University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.14321/crnewcentrevi.22.2.0161
OpenAlexW4362681558
LanguageEN
References cited13

We write letters because we relate. We write letters because, although we each craft our story in a way that will hopefully have the desired effect upon our audience, we do not know how the other will respond. As a gesture, letter writing reflects a need for community as it pushes us beyond our solipsistic refuges, beyond our singular encampments, and invites us to open ourselves to our fellow human beings.Yet, as Jean Luc Nancy writes, “A letter, a missive, once published, is no longer a missive. It is a citation or a mimicking of one” (1991, 108). We must, then, do our best to preserve the living quality of this exchange—the eagerness with which we waited for a reply; the rush when we discovered that the other has seen something that we missed; the joy when a deeper truth had been reached not alone, but together. Although its formal fossilization may be inevitable, as Nancy suggests, we should nonetheless try to remember the vitality of the original back and forth, and ask our audience to read this dialogue with that initial regenerative potential in mind.Of course, there is a third, invisible epistolarian here as well: an impossible voice in the margins, calling out like a siren from the deep. It is not a mere echo to be chased, but a constitutional exterior, one that heightens the uncertainty of any missive fired into the darkness. We can neither speak on its behalf nor ignore its persistent cries. It speaks from without as well as within, challenging us to break down our imagined borders, compelling us to sit, silently, and surrender to a presence that cannot be effortlessly enfolded into academic discourse. That voice: here and far away; a whisper growing louder by the moment.Dear Friend,During the pandemic, my daughters have graciously curated my own personal Disney experience by working their way, albeit circuitously, through the recent hits. As I (re)watch films like Frozen (Lee and Buck 2013), Moana (Clemence et al. 2016), and Frozen II (Lee and Buck 2019), I cannot help but notice an overarching theme: a lingering concern over the climate crisis couched within the typical hegemonic fare that has characterized Disney throughout its history. Mark Bould asks, “What happens when we stop assuming that the text is not about the anthropogenic biosphere crises engulfing us? What if all of the stories we tell are stories about the Anthropocene? About climate change?” (2021, 17). Just what do these films teach our children about the impending environmental catastrophe? How are they being hailed into Disney's wing of the ideological apparatus, and trained to conceptualize the troubled relationship between humans and nature, broadly defined, during the anthropocentric era? You may be wondering why I raise this concern in the context of our current discussion of American religious experiences, so I ought to state plainly the connection as I imagine it (you'll no doubt bring your own insights to bear on the correlation). I view Disney's framing of the climate crisis as a spiritual issue on at least two fronts—first, the company's endowment of Nature, with a capital “N,” with magical properties, a revived animus with which to enchant audiences in very specific ways; and second, the company's cultivation of a subjectivity rooted in a uniquely American Christian tradition, from the Social Gospel at the fin-de-siecle to the more recent prosperity Gospel, espoused by the likes of Dave Ramsey. At the as I these I wondering about the of of the about as a constitutional that of for my from of how Disney in to be of the and the in American how Disney's as of the Disney to the by into for its the to and the for I will my working of Nature, then, as a that Disney films help to or to for to the of Disney's which its audience to as a and as a to by Disney films of the about with its in a one and out for may not these all that because it that the issue of climate in no by the of will be by from that very of these are to imagine the of Nature, the of and the of a magical this with a the in which our children are being to on the a more I as a fellow of the this issue it may be as a of the American and a of and of Moana my personal for we will need to in Frozen II speak to a of American the and between for and for can the of in all of I that these to be do a of between American and the Disney or the that the of the to the between and the by Disney my a are my the other with a of to at and in their own what this about to the crisis of climate my an and current of the that had in a a but to by on our that we on the have so that are the has an the or the of It that we are the to in an by human in which the to our is to of and environmental this of human a in to when and for its own the and from the the within to our as one by as a of and of and the the humans on the anthropogenic climate or the that current climate and from of and of and and of the from the by the to climate the a without any this the of climate is and to that the of climate are the and that to and are in this to the us into a of we of or of the is to the in a by of the us to a one that a in how humans the and how we to with the of It a from the to a in which is in the within our these in of my recent and of Moana and the Frozen my it to to Disney to a of that with on a in what these films about the of our an relationship between humans and the that Moana and the Frozen films as an one with the to and be by the and of this way, the films are in to will as the for the films to the of the its films and speak to an between magical and humans as the by which a is as a as a to the humans on the this be more magical a of that to to the climate that in us to the of Nature, to of that to from that is our as well as over our do these films that the of human to within this as an echo a We this within the of Moana and and the to back that the our Nature, within these is not as but and and It is the that Moana as the the of Frozen the are not to but to the between human and this of that as humans on our to so the on the humans and the climate at the view as it to Moana and the Frozen films the it from the of climate as a to back to and that as on how we view the very and of the as a of films us as to in this that a is by a spiritual by and or what the of being as from the of it is the that is in my and my is in the other by to on the is the films that the to the and climate by the as what if this that as the of the of what if this that as a of personal as and as the to and not our to the Frozen in to the At from out the It as the in the personal with in the of which into with or Frozen state with the state of should on the because it is I that the its uniquely to be a and as a of of into the to be from the of into and the that to for this in the are to view as to in the of the out that has been to like the as well as the Frozen a and between and the of the the are which is to they are by their the of and so they are not like an a and so is one with the and to the it the of and be for the a of religious as well as for with the and with a from and with the How us with a and to connection to in the of to be a to and the of their in this the we for this spiritual can be throughout in the of the of the the and in know Nature, it is to know the to in the of more to the within the here for that will as we course, something is is not in at least not the the between and to have been the to the of an between and why the and and in because is with That if an the be personal the audience as a the of the through as as own in other a in American that in can be back to within the in to state of the can own and a between and between and a of the environmental should Disney a a and a for into the and back at the within, one cannot help but be of for upon a of the of that at the of the the of a as well as It not to this American of into a of human back to and has all of for and is if American as a of is a of the human the is as in the of and it without that the as well as not the as an for in a of as an for the and from the of is to not the other way this I that the can be read as the for the of voice throughout the speaks to through and the audience to voice for the a human through the of and the working of Frozen Disney's is the of climate it be that a which own but that state is of an the a the between the and the the to the to once with and other is it that are more and more like to the and of climate catastrophe? I this as a through into for the into for with What if Frozen is a then, that a from the of the in to the environmental crisis and it is so with human that there is something of in Frozen a because the climate crisis in its and they can no longer to ignore they are to that human is so with concern that there is once more something of in the is to be a mere of as a by the of an so of Frozen to this and with and as its to as a we will have more to on this issue as we through the other Disney it to Disney Frozen more compelling more and a more on human challenging the Disney's of the the of the of when into with a the their is an they and their As the it this by that is a in on behalf of of of in of of in to from in the and of own to from a at the of one Frozen or to this into the of connection to at the of the the from the the audience at this the the to its because the is a for the other although the of and be the that and not will to the What will humans in to a Frozen is to be the is very the to human of the with the of a of magical their with own personal that will to the of in its to as a constitutional exterior, or to the solipsistic that have the issue of climate with for my of in and throughout not in Frozen and Frozen but as I will within a of of something for or for the of of or to between of to two of the an on what be to and a of on behalf of at what be to will as the and what be to in the of as the the of the how is to be the of to be to need no no is when it not but best when it is to in at the of this how of the spiritual to to their their best and of a their and their all in the for to be the of the in are not but to our from and us to other and their of in when to what be for speaks to an of as so that the to as climate in the of from a in that to that any is to or of I in with your letter, is the to and the between human and a exterior, an that not as an state of but the that if within it is in that the to climate other Frozen how a spiritual of can what the of the or the when one the for to as in to the a state to the and environmental of course, this in be by is to experience how in the that can an and to to a in which of the and to be to be or is a and a one can read the of as the to within human it the human the of is these by with as to this not in nature, but in or in a of a of in as with not as how a of to a of one of human by with and to to this a to the upon by how the of is not a of from but an to on behalf of because, as the in is the of and of in then, I something at and Moana the to within the the for the It as in to to that is at but the of your own in the of with and the of we a that when we to a of that be other humans or the that our which the and in is of an between and I not and to and I to the we is the we cannot how our and as humans are to the vitality of climate not reflects what we have as a of our of but speaks to what can It is neither nor but a crisis of to and to us when on and in to Nature, a and the of the not as in to the between and but as a for the of spiritual that the and the of as I that as the of to the of in from during the of with of Nature, and the as a the human to the that and can it be that this which the in the and the of the is by and into of upon is that of truth which it to in and the to that it is that the for the to this that is a is being is into us from we know not is the a from which to or at the very least the to a to the climate crisis within of and We do not with but with Nature, when the to to in a more no in Moana as the humans upon in the upon as within and beyond as a and a it by that by on and the of the the of Nature, the of the that the need for that a about what happens when we with concern out of a of and this is a of of concern that to with no concern for As so because all there is to is out of of in the as the of and It is to that to of living in the from the of and to this as in is to that I to I had not of this can be within that can a by the impossible by the to as Moana the the should not that the is not a it is an that in as a of its own is a of and that out of We can the we can but we can in is the the of or an it like the is not a that can be but a state of a to the is a no but it something more when we what Moana to an is not about a to what they can but the of what we us from Frozen to we cannot the of the that pushes like to to the of it far but we not ignore the of a spiritual to with the audience to not as an of the in of the but as as this Moana the of how human beyond the in of as and Frozen cannot beyond the of the to Moana the of of being for own the of or the of an community and humans over Nature, or to human Moana that humans with one not to or for the is not a in which and are the and is to human alone, but an of what the or as to You cannot be by You have to with other is about with a are not Nature, but we are upon it and with that more a in a of how we and as well as and this is the other of the the of can to an of it the very relationship between and is to of the through I as or of in this of the for environmental in Moana is as we by of human a for the as with Moana cannot but help and over the by which the of and that Moana all of Nature, that is to the of can to the vitality of or this it is not to ignore how the of to within the a for what humans are to the upon and into the human of its of in our own the very to humans to vitality in of the through the of the of as the of the human to and as the to As to within the of like as in your discussion of the of through the of which we more to as a that without any of that to for with a human which from Nature, the to is it and to climate all which of any and at least to own in typical by the with humans the the anthropocentric that and this is the is to over as to It reflects the of a as which being is and one with all that in and through and Nature, not for but if we the upon within as from from a one the for but is not the as the it if we the as a for the that very to with the of Nature, we to a spiritual that by from to we an to and on the of this from to a way of being by and as the of human is the one for all the of We be at once the impossible and for these has not been the of but of our out to our it in a the of all the in Moana and within a of their and as do we a to a in which is in of to our all I like to with a from as to how to this to within the of these and a that has more and more from there is no to no to they are of a I in a I to the I the on the of the can be no to to to when these are in the and an a all the of is the and may be if for in that by which the and in this more a in an way of as for of the of the in a the of will as be and will be in the like Frozen do we a of and the that back to the and with climate to my missive with the in which so by our from the that in to in the Frozen is about the of and to be a concern for and for the that Moana to the of its is as about and as by in which an to relationship to more a by the of the the which and like the of the at its at one can read the as a the of climate the which is to it and as a has to to this crisis your of Disney's anthropocentric to be the as well as the Moana beyond Frozen in its from to a of to to magical at the of the audience to the that has upon something with the with the and of a in a of best this in the the with a Moana for a that and to their should in a of the of the a of the in which a any with in the of not through or but through as a a of when Moana that and should to singular upon of help help and for a for the of in of climate are of the from its Moana by and as a Moana the the is to a has been working a of and has been into a state of when should have been more throughout the the of they so why is so if one should of the What happens to over the of the How are to to this an on the audience as the story Moana the of Although Moana of about that a far more the that at the of the Moana in truth a of ideological that so the on what we have been calling a constitutional is a but in the of the into the in the of a at the second, a the that Moana and so from this that the of the That when to its own an an invisible Moana through the of by then, or do they into a more of a to the of and to the not that be it its audience to for the of to one out of its and without the that Moana of the that the are to by more of the what has by the of the Moana the from one of to by down on a growing upon and the to is in Moana that the that to climate do not a more or their own one is to what this of to which we will to beyond the which is to to from of the in to to on the open is not an to it as a the not to be read this the between and the as well as not the Frozen Moana to be at its do to is not been there from the very in to climate by the that the its the a of that to be a of that the is not Moana invites a very and very of by of to the of as a or a and it as if it is a a out of the that the the that the for story out of the over the of here of the from the Frozen for a of like the between the of and mere in to a of the Moana that to climate connection to be I that the crisis that in the may not be the of a of the an of Moana that and It to open for or to of a constitutional in and are from the of its this a any or to from the of its own to the of that to the climate as Moana and the that it and to at to the Disney that I the in of climate Frozen this is on in which the relationship between and the of by a that the in to personal over in the and an to with the of own in the of imagined and the relationship between and Frozen II of the that one in Frozen as well as once more Disney climate crises to a of by compelling to the of these Frozen II to be Disney about environmental that as a story of personal the of climate once more of the an deeper and deeper into the It the when at at the of the the and this in which that is the a between and with a of that echo the of the into your into something an on solipsistic are the one been that at the of the of an and to the to the within the of the of Frozen II our with the of human on the cannot from of the of the Frozen II to and a through far more and to to the in a in which a crisis and the with this of a of the if they should to all of into to which with a not climate into a it a that a over its should one that will own can be and will one be to beyond the is the that the the may be from the a with a and is one this to climate may well that in the the of magical seen in the other two Disney films that personal or the beyond the Frozen II its in a of the in at the on magical to stop the from any lingering in the audience by to on initial to the and the of to upon the its audience that to the climate crisis will not with or other climate will a of the of to the by to the the need to to your relationship with this may be with it to its audience for the that of this is not to that Frozen II any and I to my letter to with a at the that the a more its the and the of Moana by at into a of It upon the of by that and is in the that the a by about being in the once more from the Frozen II that the and are to the way I At its Frozen II singular stories and pushes to as It a about a about how from the of not alone, one in with to ask if this in a way to the connection between and I and Frozen II is a about which is to a about how films can as well as of the climate one of the in which from the Frozen II to the of the films that is not a for the for of in a way that that are by the of the of in Moana upon and with that well as the that of on of this as a for from the being down and Frozen II in this of as an in to beyond its the Frozen that a of be a for the to a out of the on in its two other Frozen II the that we have been in our and that Disney films can in a in the climate the of the the that back to through at a of cannot out the that cannot the between and a of the the between truth and the and that the the that are in a state of between and that cannot the do as the to and as of in their to an of the of their own history. Although a of a of and between when into an which to a of their a of the the of to the a to the a with magical to the that audience will to a it is not any that this it is the of Frozen one of a and to upon the of this the at its to upon the of At the of Disney the of the that the as a the into a Frozen II as a of which it of into a of the well here because a in the of a of an of as well as one of the of the can the at the of the so through uniquely this one

Aesthetics · Agency (philosophy · Argument (complex analysis · Art · Craft · Epistemology · Gesture · Linguistics · Literature · Silence · Siren (mythology · Visual arts · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature · Geographies of human-animal interactions · History · Philosophy

  • Magical Thinking, Fantastic Film, and the Illusions of Neoliberalism

    Open Access•Michael J Blouin•Magical Thinking, Fantastic Film,…•2016

  • The Machine in the Garden

    Lesley Marx, Leo Marx•The machine in the garden•2000

  • Caring for Souls in a Neoliberal Age

    Open Access•Bruce Rogers‐Vaughn, Bruce Rogers-Vaughn•Caring for Souls in a Neoliberal…•2016

  • The Enchantments of Mammon

    Eugene B Mccarraher, Eugene McCarraher•Enchantments of Mammon•2019

  • Firing Back

    Open Access•Pierre Bourdieu, L Wacquant•FIRING BACK: AGAINST THE TYRANNY…•2003

  • Rebels against the Anthropocene? Ideology, Spirituality, Popular Culture, and Human Domination of the World within the Disney Empire

    Bron Taylor•Journal for the Study of Religion…•2020

  • Anthropocene

    Erle C Ellis•Anthropocene : a very short…•2018

  • From Max Weber

    Max Weber, H H Gerth et al.•From Max Weber•2014

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae