The Consistency of Hume's Position Concerning Women
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3889710 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Louise Marcil Lacoste (McGill University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1976 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 425-440 |
| Publication date | 1976-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Dialogue (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0012217300022393 |
| OpenAlex | W2127517831 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
As Professor Burns has shown, even though Hume did not offer an explicit, exhaustive treatment of "The Women Question", there are many (and, I would add, much more than three) passages in which he explains principles or facts related to the status of women. Generally speaking, and on this I fully agree with Professor Burns, the "Humean Female" qualifies as an expression of what we call today a male chauvinist position
Consistency (knowledge bases) · Economics · Epistemology · Expression (computer science) · Position (finance) · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,08 |
| Citation span | 1987 - 2024 (38) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |