The Soviet Discourse on the Origin and Class Character of Islam, 1923-1933
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3893204 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Kemper (0000-0002-6676-9563, 1Amsterdam, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-48 |
| Publication date | 2009-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Die Welt des Islams (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0043-2539 • E-ISSN: 1570-0607 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1163/157006008x364677 |
| OpenAlex | W2121841154 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 18 |
The article examines the growing radicalization of the Marxist anti-Islamic discourse in the USSR as a case-study of "Soviet Orientalism". To which of Marx's five socio-economic formations should Muslim society be assigned? During the relatively pluralistic period of the New Economic Policy (1921-1927) Marxist scholars offered various answers. Many argued that Islam emerged from the trading community of Mecca and was trade-capitalist by nature (M. Reisner, E. Beliaev, L. Klimovich). Others held that Islam reflected the interests of the agriculturalists of Medina (M. Tomara), or of the Bedouin nomads (V. Ditiakin, S. Asfendiarov); and some even detected communist elements in Islam (Z. and D. Navshirvanov). All authors found support in the Qur'ān and works of Western Orientalists. By the late 1920s Marx' and Engels' scattered statements on Islam became central in the discourse, and in 1930 Liutsian Klimovich rejected the Qur'ān altogether by arguing that the book, as well as Muhammad himself, were mere inventions of later times. By the end of the Cultural Revolution (1929-1931) it was finally "established" that Islam was "feudal" in character, and critical studies of Islam became impossible for decades. The "feudal" interpretation legitimized the Soviet attack on Islam and Muslim societies at that time; but also many of the Marxist writers on Islam perished in Stalin's Terror. We suggest that the harsh polemics the authors directed against each other in the discourse contributed to their later repression. By lending itself to the interests of the totalitarian state, Soviet Marxist Islamology committed suicide-the ultimate form of "Orientalism
Character (mathematics) · Communism · Feudalism · Islam · Marxist philosophy · Orientalism · Political science · Politics · Radicalization · Reactionary · Terrorism · Theology · Law · Philosophy · Political theory and Gramsci · Religious studies
The Qur’an for Soviet Citizens
Koran dlya sovetskikh grazhdan
An Examination of Sufism's Resistance Against the Regime in the Soviet Period (1922-1991)
Worldmaking in the Hijaz
Russia's Turn to Persia
Abu Hamid al-Ghazali in Russian Islamology
“Applied Orientalism” in Soviet Central Asia
The Study of Jadidism in Soviet and Russian Historiography
Ottoman History and the Islamic-Ottoman Cultural Legacy in Bosnia in the First Edition of the Encyclopaedia of Yugoslavia (1950–1971)
The modernity of premodern Islam in contemporary Daghestan
Marxism, early Soviet oriental studies and the problem of ‘power/knowledge’
Russian Islamophobia
Introduction
Islam Says We Are All Equal”
The Ur-Text of Jadidism
Kurdish Vernacular Learning as Indigenous Knowledge
Crusaders in Reverse? The Emergence of Political Islam in the Middle East and the Reactions of British Foreign Policy, 1978-1990
Historiography and Source Study of Jadidism in Dagestan
| Unique citing works | 18 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1.13 |
| Citation span | 2010 - 2024 (15) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 14 |