Bourgeois Bodies- Dead Criminals
England c. 1750-1830
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3896156 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Delaney (0000-0003-0693-9089, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1988 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 142 |
| Pages | 70-91 |
| Publication date | 1988-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Diogenes (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0392-1921 • E-ISSN: 1467-7695 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/039219218803614204 |
| OpenAlex | W2331407956 |
| Language | EN |
In 1795 Jeremiah Aversham went to execution bearing a flower in his mouth. "He was afterwards hung in chains on Wimbledon common, and for several months," it was reported, "thousands of the London populace passed their Sundays near the spot as if consecrated by the remains of a hero." From the perspective of bourgeois morality this was an intolerable scandal. The display of the dead body had become one of those suspicious or ill-defined areas of life that were treated as indecent or marginalised as offensive. The general rearrangement of values in the society transformed the body into an object of aversion as opposed to representation. The change of attitude made it impossible to continue inscribing the bodies of criminals with the degradation of public exposure
Art · Bourgeoisie · Political science · Politics · Historical and Scientific Studies · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
| Highly cited | No |
|---|