Assessing the impact of microfinance programming on children

An evaluation from post-tsunami Aceh

Dados Bibliográficos

ID3897448
AutoresLindsay Stark (0000-0002-8775-9735, Associate Professor, Program on Forced Migration and Health, Mailman School of Public Health Columbia University United States), Nafessa Kassim (Research assistant, Program on Forced Migration and Health, Mailman School of Public Health Columbia University United States), Thalia Sparling (0000-0002-8071-3232, Research assistant, Program on Forced Migration and Health, Mailman School of Public Health Columbia University United States), Dale Buscher (Senior Director for programmes at the Women's Refugee Commission New York United States), Gary Yu (0000-0002-8333-5222, Statistician, Program on Forced Migration and Health, Mailman School of Public Health Columbia University United States), Neil Boothby (0000-0002-0199-7434, Director at the Program on Forced Migration and Health, Mailman School of Public Health Columbia University United States)
Ano2015
Volume39
Fascículo2
Páginas295-315
Data de publicação2015-04-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoDisasters (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0361-3666 • E-ISSN: 1467-7717
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/disa.12101
PMID25441225
PMCIDPMC4381782
OpenAlexW1965986502
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas2
Referências citadas17

This paper presents an evaluation of the long-term impact of microfinance programmes on Acehnese children during the post-tsunami recovery. The study, conducted from June to August 2010, examined the impact of microfinance programming six years after the tsunami. The sample consisted of 185 microfinance participants, with a comparison group of 192 individuals who did not participate in microfinance programmes. All respondents were parents, interviewed through a structured survey. The study used four child protection indicators-diet, health, childcare and education-in contrast to traditional repayment rate indicators. The primary results were insignificant with respect to all four child protection indicators, suggesting that, with respect to these indicators, there was no long-term difference between the impact of microfinance on beneficiaries' children and non-beneficiaries' children. These findings signify a need for microfinance actors to move beyond traditional indicators of economic success to evaluate the social changes microfinance programmes are presumed to effect

Business · Child health · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental health · Family medicine · Impact evaluation · Microfinance · Social impact · Socioeconomics · Agricultural risk and resilience · Medicine · Microfinance and Financial Inclusion · Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare