Transitional coordination in Sudan (2006-08)

Lessons from the United Nations Resident Coordinator's Office

Bibliographic Data

ID3897947
AuthorsJohn N Clarke (0000-0002-1558-9845, United Nations, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume37
Issue3
Pages420-441
Publication date2013-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDisasters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0361-3666 • E-ISSN: 1467-7717
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/disa.12008
PMID23601119
OpenAlexW2007827547
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited3

With the increase in internal conflicts following the end of the Cold War, the scale and scope of the United Nations' work in conflict and post-conflict environments grew markedly. As a result, the coordination of programming and policy in the transition from relief to recovery has been a central preoccupation of academics and practitioners alike. Intergovernmental bodies such as the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) have made these topics a subject of regular discussion, while some countries have altered their bureaucratic structures to respond more effectively in post-crisis settings, particularly in cases involving the deployment of national troops. The United Nations Resident Coordinator's Office in Sudan provides a model for other transitional countries and is a useful case study of the broader challenges of post-crisis programming. Effective coordination structures and planning/programming processes are identified as interdependent prerequisites for ensuring a successful transition from relief to recovery

Bureaucracy · Developing country · Disarmament · Economic growth · Economics · Interdependence · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Scope (computer science · Software deployment · Work (physics · Computer Science · Engineering · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Political Conflict and Governance · Public Administration

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub