Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How structural mitigation shapes risk perception and affects decision-making

Bibliographic Data

ID3898342
AuthorsMarvin Starominski‐uehara (Risk Management Consultant Japan), Marvin Starominski-Uehara (0000-0002-1542-7619, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume45
Issue1
Pages46-66
Publication date2021-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDisasters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0361-3666 • E-ISSN: 1467-7717
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/disa.12412
PMID31587345
OpenAlexW2977722498
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited14

This paper reviews the relationships between risk perception and structural measures in an Australian context in three respects: (i) opinions about authorities' ability to mitigate flood risks; (ii) the role of flood experience in shaping views on risk; and (iii) perspectives on the ways in which structural measures shape decision-making pertaining to protective action. The main finding of this analysis is that the study participants do not suffer from the 'levee paradox'. Most take precautionary steps to guard against residual flood risk. Such actions, however, do not mean that there is a lack of trust in structural measures to reduce significant flood risk. The majority of the respondents agreed about the necessity of engineering structures to mitigate inherent flood risk. This support, though, does not extend to their management. Losses during major flooding in southeast Queensland, Australia, in 2010-11 were attributed primarily by residents to operational decisions concerning dam water releases

Business · Context (archaeology · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Flood mitigation · Flood myth · Flooding (psychology · Geography · Guard (computer science · Perception · Residual risk · Risk analysis (engineering · Risk management · Risk perception · Computer Science · Dam Engineering and Safety · Engineering · Environmental Science · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis · Psychology · Finance

  • Towards integrated multi-risk reduction strategies

    Open Access•Abbas FathiAzar, Silvia De Angeli et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2024

  • The effect of evacuation decisions on flash flood preparedness in Fujairah, UAE

    Open Access•Praveen Maghelal, Sudha Arlikatti et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2026

  • Causal complexity of risk perception and mitigation actions on urban flood resilience

    Open Access•Housseyn Chebika, Guoqiang Shen et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2026

  • Flood risk perception in lands “protected” by 100-year levees

    Open Access•Jessica Ludy, G Matt Kondolf•Natural Hazards•2012

  • Generalized Collinearity Diagnostics

    John Fox, Georges Monette•Journal of the American…•1992

  • The Role of Community in Disaster Response

    Open Access•Olivia Patterson, Frederick D Weil et al.•Population Research and Policy…•2010

  • Disaster Management in the United States

    Open Access•Brian J Gerber•Policy Studies Journal•2007

  • Reframing disaster policy

    Louise K Comfort, Ben Wisner et al.•Environmental Hazards•1999

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1,5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae