Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Prioritising earthquake retrofitting in Wellington, New Zealand

Bibliographic Data

ID3898590
AuthorsThoa Hoang (0000-0003-1663-7164, PhD student in economics at Wellington School of Business and Government Victoria University of Wellington New Zealand, corresponding author), Ilan Noy (0000-0003-3214-6568, Inaugural Chair in the Economics of Disasters and Climate Change Victoria University of Wellington New Zealand), Olga Filippova (0000-0001-8242-551X, Senior Lecturer at the University of Auckland New Zealand), Ken Elwood (Research Director for Te Hiranga Rū QuakeCoRE: NZ Centre for Earthquake Resilience University of Auckland New Zealand)
Year2021
Volume45
Issue4
Pages968-995
Publication date2021-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDisasters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0361-3666 • E-ISSN: 1467-7717
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/disa.12450
PMID32613663
OpenAlexW3038149064
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited19

This study describes the application of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to prioritise the seismic risk mitigation of existing buildings in earthquake-prone Wellington, New Zealand. Through retrofitting or demolition, this is an important requirement in many cities around the Pacific Rim and in other high-level seismic hazard locations. The prioritisation strategy proposed here, based on MCDA methods, can provide decision-makers with a fast and reliable support tool for identifying the optimal sequencing of their retrofitting programmes. The premise of the MCDA analysis presented in this paper is that there are multiple criteria that determine societal prioritisation preferences; these are limited not just to life safety (often the explicit/exclusive priority of governments) and commercial value (the main concern of many building owners). The study demonstrates how different measures, within four general criteria-life safety and geo-spatial, economic, and socio-cultural roles-can be operationalised as a viable framework for establishing intervention policy priorities

Business · Civil engineering · Construction engineering · Decision analysis · Demolition · Environmental health · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Forensic engineering · Geography · Multiple-criteria decision analysis · Operations research · Poison control · Retrofitting · Risk analysis (engineering · Transport engineering · Engineering · Environmental Science · Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis · Medicine · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Value Engineering and Management

  • The influence of builders on seismic strengthening of housing

    Open Access•Catalina Miranda, A Opdyke et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2026

  • Residential seismic retrofitting

    Open Access•Ehud Segal, Eran Feitelson et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2022

  • Multiple Attribute Decision Making

    Open Access•Ching-Lai Hwang, Kwangsun Yoon•Multiple Attribute Decision Making•1981

  • A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures

    Open Access•Thomas L Saaty•Journal of Mathematical Psychology•1977

  • Compromise solution by MCDM methods

    Open Access•Serafim Opricovic, Gwo‐hshiung Tzeng et al.•European Journal of Operational…•2004

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae