Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How to use Q-methodology in dream research

Assumptions, procedures and benefits

Bibliographic Data

ID3900585
AuthorsJennifer Parker (0000-0003-0977-3096), Jennifer D Parker (0000-0002-4626-9916), Chris Alford (0000-0003-0887-6958)
Year2010
Volume20
Issue3
Pages169-183
Publication date2010-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueDreaming (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1053-0797 • E-ISSN: 1573-3351
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/a0020422
OpenAlexW2035840724
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited9

Current quantitative methods of approaching dream research, which dominate published material about dreams, have led to descriptions of dreams as homogenous events. Q-methodology is an approach that may identify heterogeneity in dream report studies and subsequent dream types based upon the subjectivity of the dream experience. Q-methodology is described as a Qualiquantological approach to dream analysis which maximizes the use of statistics in a qualitative way (Stenner & Stainton-Rogers, 2004). Q is distinguished from other methods because the dreamer sorts the subjectivity of the dream they are reporting and provides a written description of the dream; these are used together to identify shared patterns of subjectivity within a large data set. The advantages of using Q-methodology are outlined and the resources necessary to conduct a study are shared. The aim of this paper is to present a preliminary explanation prior to presenting the first study to use Q-methodology in dream research. © 2010 American Psychological Association

Dream · Epistemology · Psychotherapist · Qualitative research · Set (abstract data type · Social science · Sociology · Subjectivity · Computer Science · Psychology · Q Methodology Applications · Philosophy · Social Psychology

  • "Experiencing "continuity

    Josie Malinowski, Fiona Fylan et al.•Dreaming•2014

  • Rethinking Methods in Psychology

    Jonathan Smith, Jonathan P Smith et al.•Rethinking Methods in Psychology•1995

  • The Content Analysis of Dreams

    William Stephenson, Calvin S Hall et al.•The American Journal of Psychology•1967

  • Gender differences in the content analysis of 240 dream reports from Brazilian participants in dream seminars

    Stanley Krippner, Jan Weinhold•Dreaming•2001

  • Significant dreams

    Roger M Knudson•Dreaming•2001

  • Identifying types of impactful dreams

    Ria Busink, Don Kuiken•Dreaming•1996

  • Significant dreams

    Roger M Knudson, Alexandra L Adame et al.•Dreaming•2006

  • Phenomenal qualities of nightmare experience in a prospective study of college students

    Ross Levin, Gary Fireman•Dreaming•2002

  • Comparing the content of sleep paralysis and dream reports

    Jennifer D Parker, Susan J Blackmore et al.•Dreaming•2002

  • Anorexia dreaming

    Roger M Knudson•Dreaming•2006

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,08
Citation span2014 - 2014 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae