Reckless endangerment warfare
Civilian casualties and the collateral damage exception in international humanitarian law
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3916176 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bruce Cronin (0000-0002-3776-8924, City College of New York, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 175-187 |
| Publication date | 2013-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0022343312468460 |
| OpenAlex | W2165395660 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 18 |
This article examines how military organizations that are generally committed to following the laws and customs of war exploit what the author terms 'the collateral damage exemption', by employing legally-sanctioned war-fighting strategies that result in significant numbers of civilian casualties. This exemption shields combatants from legal liability for 'incidental' or 'inadvertent' civilian losses and the destruction of civilian objects that may occur during lawful actions. The author argues that military strategies which promote the use of overwhelming force under conditions that are likely to adversely affect the civilian population on a significant scale push the boundaries of legal behavior. Under these conditions, collateral damage is not inadvertent, but the calculated results of policy decisions. Most academics, journalists, and political leaders focus on blatant violations of International Humanitarian Law (IHL), for example, deliberate attacks on civilian populations. However, these actions are in many ways the least interesting from both a policy and scholarly perspective. This is because such violations are usually unambiguous, easily detected, and difficult to defend. More insidious are practices that deliberately straddle the line between legitimate action and violation by exploiting the collateral damage exception to IHL. This article demonstrates that high rates of civilian casualties that occur under the shroud of legality threaten the integrity of the laws and customs of armed conflict
Business · Collateral · Collateral damage · Computer security · Criminology · International humanitarian law · International law · Liability · Political science · Population · Principle of legality · Sociology · Straddle · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Torture, Ethics, and Law
The Uncounted Dead
The Unintended Consequences of War
Aversion, Acceptance, or Apprehension? The Effects of Gender on US Public Opinion Concerning US-Inflicted Civilian Casualties
Air Power, NGOs, and Collateral Killings
Aproximación a La Tecnología Como Control Y Guerra Desde La Filosofía De La Cultura
U.S. sociology and the Iraq War
The politics of descriptive inference
Who are the civilians in the wars of South Sudan
Act of violence
Costs and Cover
Why Protectors Become Predators? Violence against Civilians by Amisom Peacekeepers in Somalia
Intergroup commonality, political ideology, and tolerance of enemy collateral casualties in intergroup conflicts
Bombing to win
Relevance of core body temperatures in post-stroke depression sufferers
Customary International Humanitarian Law
New and old wars
International Humanitarian Law Facing New Challenges
Protecting Civilians…or Soldiers? Humanitarian Law and the Economy of Risk in Iraq
Zero-casualty warfare
Precision attack and international humanitarian law
Restraint or Propellant? Democracy and Civilian Fatalities in Interstate Wars
One-Sided Violence Against Civilians in War
A Flawed Masterpiece
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,2 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2025 (10) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |