Intergroup Forgiveness
East Timorese and Angolan Perspectives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3917839 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Félix Neto (0000-0003-0112-880X, Universidade do Porto), Maria Da Conceição Pinto (Universidade do Porto), Etienne Mullet (0000-0002-1707-3914, EarthTech International (United States), corresponding author) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 711-728 |
| Publication date | 2007-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0022343307082067 |
| OpenAlex | W2075653306 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 36 |
The present study is a survey on intergroup forgiveness conducted among people from East Timor and Angola, most of whom have been personally touched by the various conflicts affecting their countries. Only one of the two aspects of intergroup forgiveness was assessed: granting forgiveness. A sample of 354 East Timorese adults was presented with a questionnaire addressing the meaningfulness of intergroup forgiveness and possible conceptions about granting intergroup forgiveness. Using exploratory factor analysis, an eight-factor model was derived from the participants' responses. Using confirmatory factor analysis, this model was subsequently tested on a sample of 250 Angolan adults. In both samples, a large majority of participants agreed with the idea that a group of people can forgive another group of people. Furthermore, the model derived from the East Timorese data also fitted the data from the Angolan sample: in both samples, the participants appeared to have articulated conceptions on what could define an intergroup granting of forgiveness. Specifically, a majority of participants agreed with the idea that (a) the aim of this process is reconciliation and that intergroup forgiveness is not strictly conditional on adequate reparation or compensation, and (b) this process must be democratic; in other words, granting forgiveness should be decided by a majority, and only then could forgiveness be granted on behalf of the whole community
Confirmatory factor analysis · Forgiveness · Sample (material) · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Forgiveness and Related Behaviors · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts · Psychology · Social Psychology
Designing truth
Muslim and Westerner responses to terrorism
What can reasonably be expected from a truth commission
Lay People's Views on Intergroup Forgiveness
Sharing community life after a civil war
Citizens’ Views on Amnesties, Truth Commissions, and Intergroup Forgiveness
Networked Governance of Freedom and Tyranny
Forgivingness
How Religion Promotes Forgiveness
Seeking forgiveness in an intergroup context
Demanding Truth
The granting of forgiveness in an intergroup context
Symbolic Closure through Memory, Reparation and Revenge in post-Conflict Societies
Unspeakable Truths
Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions
An Ethic For Enemies
Helping clients forgive
The adolescent as forgiver
The Psychology of Unforgiveness and Forgiveness and Implications for Clinical Practice
Forgiving Usually Takes Time
Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone
War and Reconciliation
A model of dual attitudes
Tiny, Poor and War-Torn
Monitoring Trends in Global Combat
Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships
Journal of Peace Research
Forgiveness and Politics
Genocide and Mass Killing
Symbolic closure through memory,reparation and revenge in post-conflict societies
The Propensity to Forgive
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,63 |
| Citation span | 2007 - 2025 (19) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |