Tension between the Strong, and the Strategies of the Weak
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3918010 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hans Mouritzen (University of Copenhagen, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1991 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 217-230 |
| Publication date | 1991-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0022343391028002007 |
| OpenAlex | W2098227770 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 17 |
| References cited | 13 |
How is the position of weak powers today affected by detente and emerging US-Soviet cooperation? More generally, what happens to the power position and the security strategies of the weak as tension fluctuates between the strong? What happens, in particular, to their ability and willingness to mediate between the strong and hence contribute to detente? A theoretical construct, a `constellation theory', is established in order to answer these questions. `Constellation' refers to the weak nation's basic set of relationships to the strong, be it a symmetric constellation, an alliance constellation or some other type. The expectations derived from the theory are confronted with observations of Swedish and Finnish strategies during the rising and high level of superpower tension in the first half of the 1980s. Only one minor deviation between expectations and observations is found, and this can be accounted for fairly well. The two neighbouring countries, with relatively similar domestic political systems (and similar archipelagos!) but involved in different constellations, are found to be affected in inverse ways by rising and high tension: Swedish policy is activated whereas Finnish policy is de-activated. This corroborates the theoretically justified belief in the explanatory power of the notion of `constellations'. In the concluding section, some speculations on weak powers in the alliance constellation are made. The results of this article should be seen as a criticism of the small state research which theorizes on `small states' (`weak powers') in general, without explicitly considering the constellations in which they are involved
Alliance · Constellation · Construct (python library) · Criticism · Economics · Law and economics · Order (exchange) · Physics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Position (finance) · Positive economics · Power (physics) · Sociology · Superpower · Computer Science · Law · Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics · Psychology · Social Psychology
Branding Nordicity
Uluslararası İlişkilerde “Küçük Devletler”
Geopolitical Positioning of a Small State
Great Power Politics and Small Power Strategies in the Nordic Region
Punching above their weight, but why? Explaining Denmark and Estonia in the transatlantic relationship
Small power strategies under great power competition
Small Power Hedging in an Era of Great-power Politics
Small, Smart and Salient? Rethinking Identity in the Small States Literature
Explaining the behaviour of small states
European small states' military policies after the Cold War
Running in Place
Learning to assert themselves
Neutrality
The Two Musterknaben and the Naughty Boy
Fire nordiske Ruslands-relationer. På vej mod en fællesnordisk Ruslands-politik efter Krim og Trump
Strength of Weakness
Constructing the CFSP
Alliances and small powers
The survival of small states
Behavioral Theory of the Firm
Alliances and Small Powers, by Robert L. Rothstein
Internasjonal Politikk
Silk Glove Hegemony
The International Civil Service
Finlandization
The Big Influence of Small Allies
Models of Neutrality
Small States in Europe and Dependence
Size and Foreign Policy Behavior
Coping with a Greedy Neighbour
| Unique citing works | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,52 |
| Citation span | 1993 - 2024 (32) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 16 |