The Illusion of State Power
Transnational Corporations and the Neutralization of Host-Country Legislation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3918109 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas J Biersteker (0000-0001-8176-0914, Department of Political Science Yale University and the International Peace Research Institute, Oslo, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1980 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 207-221 |
| Publication date | 1980-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/002234338001700302 |
| OpenAlex | W2032451268 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 18 |
Ten years ago there was widespread agreement that transnational corporations constrained the exercise of state power in the Third World. During the 1970s, however, there have been increasing challenges to this idea. Neo-conservatives, neo-mercantilists, bargaining writers, and statists have all been struck by the growth of economic nationalism and the resurgence of the state. Thus, a new orthodoxy has emerged which suggests that the transnational corporation rather than national sovereignty is increasingly 'at bay'. The research described in this article examined the responses of transnational corporations to Nigeria's increasingly stringent indigenization policies during the 1970s. Transnational corporations have developed a range of defensive strategies which effectively neutralize the Nigerian policy. Thus it is clear first that an increase in the frequency of state actions is by no means equivalent to an increase in the effectiveness of state actions. Second, the sharing of equity is a long way from the sharing of control in joint ventures with transnational corporations. Third, any assessment of the balance of bargaining power between states and transnational corporations must take account of the dynamics of change within each of the major protagonists. Changes have taken place in the relationship between states and transnational corporations during the 1970s. However, most observers have ignored the defensive responses and capabilities of transnational corporations. The balance of bargaining power between host- countries and transnational corporations has not shifted either as far or as quickly as most of the advocates of the 'resurgence of the state' literature maintain
Bargaining power · Economics · Law and economics · Multinational corporation · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics) · Scapegoating · Sovereignty · State (computer science) · Global Political and Social Dynamics · Indian Economic and Social Development · Law · World Systems and Global Transformations
Multinational firms' global strategies, host country indigenisation of ownership and welfare
Compensation or Opportunity? The Effects of International Recessions upon Direct Foreign Investment and Growth in Third World States, 1970-1978
British Government, British Businesses, and the Indigenization Exercise in Post-Independence Nigeria
Dividing the Oils
Transnational Corporations as Global Political Actors
Reexamining the “obsolescing bargain
The State in an Era of Cascading Politics
Hard Bargains
Corporations and Nations
The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America
The United States in the World Today
Multinational Corporations and the Politics of Dependence
U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation
Dependent Development
International Organization
Balance of Payments Yearbook
The Threat from the Third World
Dependency and development in Latin America
State and Society
State Power and the Structure of International Trade
Multinational corporations and the Third World
Changing configurations of power in North-South Relations since 1945
Multinational corporations and dependency
Three models of the future
Coming Investment Wars
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,26 |
| Citation span | 1983 - 2024 (42) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |