Societal security, the security dilemma, and extreme anti-migrant hostility in Russia
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3918232 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Mikhail A Alexseev (0000-0002-2733-2182, San Diego State University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2011 |
| Volumen | 48 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 509-523 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2011-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0022343311406155 |
| OpenAlex | W2038745644 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 14 |
| Referencias citadas | 49 |
The societal security theory posits that extreme anti-migrant hostility - such as demands to deport all migrants unconditionally - emerges when host communities see migration as a threat to the survival of their group identity. An alternative interpretation - the immigration security dilemma - attributes extreme hostility to the human tendency to prepare for the worst under uncertainty when central authority weakens. Does extreme intergroup hostility relate more to threats framed in terms of group survival or to those framed in terms of uncertainty about government capacity and migration effects? I investigate this question empirically with the Russian national survey data (2005, N = 680) asking who in Russia supports the deportation of all internal and external migrants, legal and illegal, and their children to their places of origin - an extreme and widespread view that would require forced population movements not seen in the region since Stalin's Great Terror. In multivariate tests, agreement with the societal security (survival) rhetoric explained about five percent of variation in support for unconditional, wholesale deportation of migrants; agreement with the security dilemma (uncertainty) rhetoric - about 20%. A comparison of attitudes in the same survey to Armenian, Uzbek, Chechen, and Chinese migrants and the association of each ethnic group with different types of security threat further support this finding. Hostility toward ethnic groups viewed as a weak security threat was more diagnostic of public support for wholesale deportation of migrants than hostility toward groups viewed as a strong security threat
China · Deportation · Dilemma · Government (linguistics) · Hostility · Humiliation · Immigration · Political science · Security Dilemma · Law · Migration, Health and Trauma · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Political Conflict and Governance · Psychology · Social Psychology
Cultural solidarity, economic threat
Does fear of migrant crime predict xenophobia
The Transnistria Problem and the Crisis in Ukraine
Energy securitization and desecuritization in the New Middle East
Opposition to Immigration, Economic Insecurity and Individual Values
Anti-immigrant Attitudes in Russia
The Russian Radical Right Movement and Immigration Policy
Uncovering Economic Grievances behind Radical Protests
Securitization in Autocratic Settings
Does Origin Matter? Ethnic Group Position and Attitudes Toward Immigrants
The Asymmetry of Nationalist Exclusion and Inclusion
Analysing Payoff Salience in Coalition Allocation
The mechanisms of forced military enlistment amid the intersections of ethnicity, rurality and spatial mobility in Russia
The evolution of violence within far-right mobilization
Frustration and aggression.
Challenging Immigration and Ethnic Relations Politics
The authoritarian personality
Symbolic Racism, Old-Fashioned Racism, and Whites' Opposition to Affirmative Action
Russian Nationalism and the National Reassertion of Russia
Security
The Politics of Insecurity
Prejudice as a Response to Perceived Group Threat
Societal security and social psychology
Opposition to Bilingual Education
An analysis of public opinion toward undocumented immigration
An analysis of public opinion toward undocumented immigration
The security dilemma and ethnic conflict
Out of the Red Shadows
Identity, migration and the new security agenda in Europe
Anti-Immigrant Prejudice in Europe
Securitization or Securing Rights? Exploring the Conceptual Foundations of Policies towards Minorities and Migrants in Europe
Extreme right‐wing voting in Western Europe
Explaining Variation In The Success Of Extreme Right Parties In Western Europe
Contemporary American Attitudes toward U.S. Immigration
Ethnic groups in conflict
Cooperation under the Security Dilemma
Public Opinion Toward Immigration Reform
Improving Anchoring Vignettes
Gender Gap in Political Tolerance
Enigmas of Intolerance
European Security Identities
Political Attitudes and the Gender Gap in the USSR
Constructing Tolerance
Immigration and the politics of security
The Geography of Fear
Securitization and the Construction of Security
Security and Immigration
Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma
Perceptions of Racial Group Competition
Immigration, Race, and Riot
Economic Insecurity, Prejudicial Stereotypes, and Public Opinion on Immigration Policy
Russia, China, and the Immigration Security Dilemma
People, states and fear
Racial Threat and Partisan Identification
Imaginary Ethnicity
Defending Turf
Attitudes on Residential Integration
Delinquency and Disdain
Defended Neighborhoods, Integration, and Racially Motivated Crime
French Front National voting
| Obras citantes distintas | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,08 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2013 - 2026 (14) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 14 |