International Structure and International Integration
The Case of Latin America
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3918252 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Olav Reinton (International Peace Research Institute, Oslo, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1967 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 334-364 |
| Publication date | 1967-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/002234336700400402 |
| OpenAlex | W2118801635 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
The article investigates interaction and integration in Latin America, using nations as units. Four indices of international stratification are presented and compared, and intensity of interaction within different pairs of nations is analysed. Interaction is measured in terms of trade, airborne transport, participation in continental meetings, negotiations, and participation in World Wars. The consequences of interactive disequilibrium appear important in analysis of inter action. An equilibrated pair, with units of equal status, is characterized by mutual exchange on equal level of intensity, and mutual influence that flows within the pair. A disequilibrated pair may be characterized by high intensity of interaction, but the exchange is not mutual, and there is no flow of influence. Equilibrated units influence each other; while in a disequilibrated pair one unit dominates, not influences, the other. The medium status units appear most important in international integration; such units foresee mobility in the international system, and imagine that international integration may make it possible to challenge top status units in the system. These and other findings are compared with findings in small group research, which are proved fruitful in the interpretations of our findings. We discover that Latin American nations do not imitate and are not responsive towards the United States because of lack of mobility within the inter-American system. Since the United States behaves as a 'superdog' in the system, thus dominating Latin American nations, the Latin American nations become followers of the United States and eager participants in inter-American meetings. It is our contention, however, that the United States' image in Latin America disappears when United States dominance ceases, because this image is not internalised in the local culture. One important policy implication emerges from our analysis: if a nation wants to influence another, its policy should aim at supporting the other nation in its attempts to gain the same status in the system as that of the 'would-be' influencer
Business · Disequilibrium · International relations · International trade · Latin Americans · Negotiation · Political science · Sociology · International Relations in Latin America · Law · Medicine
Through Glasses Darkly
The Study of Regional Integration
Integration by Whom, for Whom, against Whom
A Subsystemic Analysis of the Southern African Development Coordination Conference
The Middle East
Dominance and dependence in an international context
International Organization and Violence with Special Reference to the Performance of the UN System
Integration Logics
Further Notes on Operationalizing Some Variables Related to Regional Integration
The Operationalization of Some Variables Related to Regional Integration
Innovation in Latin American Regionalism
Capabilities in Context
Trends in World Airline Patterns
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,22 |
| Citation span | 1967 - 1986 (20) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |