Two Civilizations and Ethnic Conflict
Islam and the West
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3918356 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jonathan Fox (0000-0002-0422-7275, Bar-Ilan University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 459-472 |
| Publication date | 2001-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0022343301038004004 |
| OpenAlex | W2110176690 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 29 |
| References cited | 41 |
Samuel Huntington's controversial `Clash of Civilizations' argument posits, among other things, that the extent of both international and domestic conflict between `civilizations' will increase with the end of the Cold War. This is expected to be especially true of clashes involving the Western and Islamic civilizations and even more so for clashes between these two civilizations. This article uses the Minorities at Risk dataset, along with independently collected variables, to test these propositions with regard to ethnic conflict, which Huntington includes in his theory under the title of `fault line' conflicts within states. The results are examined from three perspectives: globally, from the perspective of the Islamic civilization, and from the perspective of the Western civilization. Globally, there has been little change in the ratio of civilizational versus non-civilizational ethnic conflict since the end of the Cold War. There has also been little change in Islamic involvement in civilizational ethnic conflict since the end of the Cold War. However, from a Western perspective, the proportion of civilizational conflicts involving Western groups that are with Islamic groups increased dramatically after the end of the Cold War. Thus, the results show that if one focuses narrowly on the perspective of the Western civilization, there is some support for Huntington's claims regarding Islam, but not for a general increase in civilizational conflict. However, from the perspective of the Islamic civilization and from a broader global perspective, there is little support for Huntington's arguments
Argument (complex analysis) · Civilization · Development economics · Economics · Environmental ethics · Ethnic group · Islam · Perspective (graphical) · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · Western culture · History · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Medicine · Philosophy · Political Conflict and Governance · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
What kind of ‘world order’? An artificial neural networks approach to intensive data mining
Islamic civilization in the age of globalization
U.S. Soft Power and the “China Threat”
The British state ‘security syndrome’ and Muslim diversity
Paradigm Lost
Do Muslims engage in more domestic conflict than other religious groups
Arab Muslim Attitudes Toward the West
Islam and Democracy in Indonesia
American Orientalism and American Exceptionalism
The Role of Self-Fulfilling and Self-Negating Prophecies in International Relations
Sacred and Secular
A New Wave of Research on Civilizational Politics
Rethinking Civilizational Identity from the Bottom Up
Civilizational futures
The Human Rights Peace
Democratic Peace or Clash of Civilizations? Target States and Support for War in Britain and the United States
Regime Types and Discrimination against Ethnoreligious Minorities
Foreign Policy Attitudes toward Islamic Actors
Religion and State Failure
Analyzing ethnographic interviews
Cultural Leaders and the Clash of Civilizations
Disputes over the Divine
Clash of Civilizations or Clash of Religions
State Failure and the Clash of Civilisations
Religion and Sexual Behaviors
Is There a Clash of Civilizations? Evidence from Patterns of International Conflict Involvement, 1946-97
Civilizational Conflicts
Who are the Romans? The Definition ofBilād al-Rūm(Land of the Romans) in Medieval Islamic Geographies
Do cultures clash
Peoples versus states
Islam and the Myth of Confrontation
The Clash of Civilizations
Islamic Political Culture, Democracy, and Human Rights
Is Islam more conflict prone than other religions? A cross‐sectional study of ethnoreligious conflict
The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order
The islamic threat
The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order
Islam and the myth of confrontation
Building up New Bogeymen
The Future of Islam and the West
The ethnic sources of nationalism
Explaining Ethnic Political Participation
Why Minorities Rebel
Culture or Contiguity
Colorful Community or Ethnic Witches' Brew
Democracy and Islam
Ethnicity Matters
The Democratic Peace Through the Lens of Culture, 1820-1989
Ethnopolitical Rebellion
The West's Modern Encounter with Islam
Peoples Against States
The Modernizing Imperative
The Summoning
Clash of Civilizations, or Realism and Liberalism Déjà Vu? Some Evidence
Civil War in the Post-Colonial World, 1946-92
Political Conflict in Less Developed Countries 1981-89
Just like the Rest
Global Utopias and Clashing Civilizations
If Not Civilizations, What? Paradigms of the Post-Cold War World
The Dangers of Decadence
The West Unique, Not Universal
Culture Clash-Ification
The Case for Optimism
Asia, a Civilization in the Making
The Clash of Civilizations
| Unique citing works | 29 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,16 |
| Citation span | 2001 - 2025 (25) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 29 |